New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SNIA S10-300 Exam - Topic 8 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for SNIA's S10-300 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 8
[All S10-300 Questions]

Company.com is designing a disaster recovery (DR) plan using synchronous array based data replication with Fiber Channel SAN extension technology. The remote site is 125 km from the production facility. Which solution fits their needs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Natalie
4 months ago
Really? I thought iSCSI would be more reliable for DR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
4 months ago
Totally agree, FCIP is designed for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
4 months ago
Isn't 125 km pushing it for synchronous replication?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
4 months ago
I think DWDM might be a better fit, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
5 months ago
FCIP is the way to go for that distance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
5 months ago
I vaguely recall that IFCIP is related to Fiber Channel, but I’m not sure how it compares to FCIP. I feel like I need to review the differences between these technologies before making a choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options. I thought ISCSI bridges were more for block storage over IP networks, not specifically for Fiber Channel. I’m leaning towards FCIP, but I need to double-check the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
I think I came across a similar question where they asked about data replication over long distances. I feel like DWDM might be the right answer since it can handle high bandwidth over long distances, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
5 months ago
I remember studying about FCIP and how it allows for the extension of Fiber Channel over IP networks. It seems like a good fit for this scenario, but I'm not entirely sure about the distance limitations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
5 months ago
Okay, the key information here is that the operation takes effect for the entire meeting, not just a single venue. I think the answer is probably A, extending the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if legal fees or system recovery would count as indirect costs. I'll have to review my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky question, but I think DMVPN might be the best option. It can provide the load balancing and IPv6 support required, and it's a relatively simple and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel