Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SNIA S10-300 Exam - Topic 6 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for SNIA's S10-300 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 6
[All S10-300 Questions]

A heterogeneous SAN consists of one RAID with four LUNs, one hub, and four servers. How

should you assign one LUN to each server while preventing other servers from accessing other

LUNs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Ozell at Jun 16, 2022, 04:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S10-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jimmie
5 months ago
D is interesting, but switching to a hub might complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
6 months ago
Wait, can you really just disable LUNs in the OS? Sounds sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
6 months ago
B seems a bit risky, what if the OS changes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
6 months ago
I think A could work too, but not as secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
6 months ago
C is definitely the way to go for LUN masking!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
6 months ago
I think persistent binding could help with LUN assignments, but I'm not convinced it actually prevents access to other LUNs like the question asks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to use zoning, but I can't recall if it was soft zoning or hard zoning that was more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like disabling LUNs in the OS might not be a secure way to prevent access. It seems too easy to bypass.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
7 months ago
I remember something about LUN masking being crucial for restricting access, so I think option C might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
7 months ago
Okay, let me see. Reporting discrepancies as incidents - that sounds like it would be part of the test closure activities, where you're wrapping up the testing process and documenting the results. I'm going to go with option C for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
7 months ago
Okay, let me see... When a case is suspended, it's likely that the system would raise some kind of event to indicate that status change. I'm going to go with Option B, Activity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel