Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SNIA S10-300 Exam - Topic 3 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for SNIA's S10-300 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 3
[All S10-300 Questions]

Company.com is planning to implement a new service, and needs to deploy two servers in a

active/passive cluster maintaining a large repository of data. This data will include three sets of data:

SET 1:Stream type data:3MB Files on average :many thousands

SET 2:Large file data:200KB Files on average: many millions

SET 3:Small file data: 15 KB Files on average:hundereds of millions

The application developer is writing code that is specific to an implementation of clustering that requires block level access. Which solution does not degrade performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Alpha at May 08, 2022, 03:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S10-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Deonna
5 months ago
Option C seems like a bad idea for large datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
6 months ago
Surprised they’re not considering SSDs for better speed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
6 months ago
Isn't RAID 0+1 a bit risky for critical data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
6 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense for performance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
6 months ago
RAID 5 is great for redundancy but can be slow with small files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where partitioning was key, but I can't recall if using the OS or the array for partitioning makes a big difference in performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
6 months ago
I feel like using a single RAID 5 grouping could lead to performance issues, especially with the large number of small files in set 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
6 months ago
I think deploying set 1 and 2 as independent RAID 5 groupings sounds familiar, but I'm unsure if that would really optimize performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
7 months ago
I remember practicing RAID configurations, but I'm not sure if RAID 5 is the best for small files like in set 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
7 months ago
I think the key requirements here are that the servers need to have similar processors and shared storage. The question mentions "HA-enabled" and "Live Migration", so the hardware needs to be compatible for those features to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
7 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The senior managers would be responsible for coordinating and directing the recovery activities, making sure resources are allocated properly, and overseeing the whole process. Seems pretty clear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
7 months ago
I think adding an Adobe Analytics configuration might make sense, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right approach for pixels specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel