Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SNIA S10-300 Exam - Topic 12 Question 45 Discussion

A client is consolidating a database server into an existing SAN attached array with 73 GB drives and a default LUN size of 8.8 GB. The server currently uses O/S based volume management on9 GB LUNs carved from 36 GB drives in a direct attached disk array. The array is connected using two 100 MB/s FC ports. The file systems are set at a default blocksize of 2048. Which would be the most important to address in your design?
A) Adapt to standard LUN sizes, paying migration penalities
B) Upgrade connectivity from 100 to 200 GB, incurring upgrade cost
C) Account for change in access density from 36 GB to 73 GB drive
D) Determine capacity/performance impact of file system parameters

SNIA S10-300 Exam - Topic 12 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for SNIA's S10-300 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 12
[All S10-300 Questions]

A client is consolidating a database server into an existing SAN attached array with 73 GB drives and a default LUN size of 8.8 GB. The server currently uses O/S based volume management on

9 GB LUNs carved from 36 GB drives in a direct attached disk array. The array is connected using two 100 MB/s FC ports. The file systems are set at a default blocksize of 2048. Which would be the most important to address in your design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lashandra at May 04, 2022, 08:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S10-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kris
11 months ago
Not sure if migration penalties are worth it, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
11 months ago
Definitely need to consider file system impacts too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
11 months ago
Surprised no one mentioned the access density change!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
11 months ago
I think upgrading connectivity is more crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
11 months ago
Gotta adapt to those standard LUN sizes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
12 months ago
I vaguely remember something about file system parameters impacting capacity and performance. Should we prioritize that in our design?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
12 months ago
I feel like the change in access density from 36 GB to 73 GB drives is a big deal. It might affect performance, but I can't recall all the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
12 months ago
I think upgrading the connectivity could be crucial, especially since the current speed seems quite low. But, is the cost justifiable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
12 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of adapting to standard LUN sizes, but I'm not sure if the migration penalties are worth it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
12 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the M-100 in option A would have enough storage for the APAC logs, and the log collector-mode M-500s in options B and C seem like they might be overkill. I'll need to carefully weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
12 months ago
Alright, let me break this down. The FCC deals with communications, so that's a good possibility. The Department of Commerce also seems like it could be involved in privacy policy. I'm going to take a closer look at those two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
12 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Hi-care is delivered directly by Huawei, while Co-care is sold and delivered by channels. I'm pretty sure one of the options is incorrect, but I need to carefully read through them again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
12 months ago
I'm pretty sure text-level elements are inline elements, so I'll eliminate the block-level elements like

and
.

upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel