Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SNIA S10-300 Exam - Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

An existing SAN has been experiencing numerous faults in the past few months, you have beenTasked with bringing the problems to solution and ensure reliability. Your primary concern is visibility into the SAN and the present lack of monitoring. Which two are true about the existing infrastructure? (Choose two)
A) Evaluating vendor supplied tools, and knowledge base type documents may outline best practices for increasing reliability and reporting . and C) Testing and then Level settings firmware and code levels to a common vendor supported standard will allow you to avoid many of the problems that may have been encountered in the past.
B) Requesting vendor assistance, and if need be custom builds of the firmware/software that runs your array to fix the specific problems that you encounter.
D) Since SMI-S is an emerging standard, the likehood of being able to manage equipment bought in previous years is very low. A migration plan should be considered to an SMI-S complaint infrastructure.

SNIA S10-300 Exam - Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for SNIA's S10-300 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 1
[All S10-300 Questions]

An existing SAN has been experiencing numerous faults in the past few months, you have been

Tasked with bringing the problems to solution and ensure reliability. Your primary concern is visibility into the SAN and the present lack of monitoring. Which two are true about the existing infrastructure? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Cherry at May 09, 2022, 01:28 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S10-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Geoffrey
7 months ago
A is a must, but I’m not sure about D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
7 months ago
Wait, D sounds a bit extreme. Is SMI-S really that limiting?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
7 months ago
C is definitely true, standardizing helps avoid headaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
8 months ago
Totally agree with B, vendor help can be a game changer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
8 months ago
A and C seem spot on for improving reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
8 months ago
I vaguely remember something about SMI-S from our readings. Option D seems a bit tricky since I thought some older equipment could still be managed, but maybe a migration plan is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
8 months ago
I feel like option C is definitely something we covered. Standardizing firmware levels can help with reliability, but I wonder if it’s enough on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
8 months ago
I think option B might be relevant too. We practiced a similar question about requesting vendor support, but I can't recall if it was specifically about firmware issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
8 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of vendor tools in our last study session. Option A seems like it could be a good choice, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. If the same IP shows up at two consecutive hops, that might indicate a routing loop or a network device that's causing the traffic to loop back. I'll have to weigh the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The Exception Shielding pattern is all about encapsulating exception handling logic, so the valid options would be either within a service agent or a utility service, but not as part of the core service logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
8 months ago
Gotta be Agile, right? That's all about frequent feedback, collaboration, and adapting to changes. Seems like the perfect fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel