Sitecore Exam Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer Topic 2 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Sitecore's Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer exam

Question #: 20
Topic #: 2

[All Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer Questions]

A multinational clothing company wants to create regional sites for its online presence. Each site would follow the same branding but have unique content per region. The content architecture requires a site per region. Of the options presented below, which is the most efficient approach to deploy the rendering host?

AUse separate instances of XM Cloud for each brand and country to maintain separation.

Brendering host application deployed for each site.

CA single rendering host application using the JSS multisite feature.

DCreate a single site collection and site for all brands and countries and also manage their resources manually.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

According to the Sitecore XM Cloud Documentation for Developers1, security roles define how different users access different types of records in Sitecore. To control access to data and resources, you can create or modify security roles and change the security roles that are assigned to your users. A user can have multiple security roles. Security role privileges are cumulative. Users are granted the privileges that are available in each role that's assigned to them2.

This makes it easier for you to manage your security system because you do not necessarily have to assign access rights for each item in your content tree. Instead, you only need to assign and manage the access rights on the parent items and then specify whether their descendants can inherit these access rights3.

by Lai at Sep 12, 2024, 08:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Detra

19 days ago

Wait, so they want to create a bunch of regional sites but can't decide how to deploy the rendering host? Sounds like they need to hire a few more 'cloud architects' to figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ria

26 days ago

Option B, a rendering host application deployed for each site? Sounds like a lot of work and unnecessary duplication. I'll pass on that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arminda

27 days ago

Option D? Are you kidding me? Managing all the resources manually in a single site collection? That's just asking for trouble. No, thank you!

upvoted 0 times

Daniel

18 days ago

A) Use separate instances of XM Cloud for each brand and country to maintain separation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

1 months ago

I agree, Option C is the way to go. Maintaining separate instances of XM Cloud for each brand and country (Option A) sounds like overkill and would be a nightmare to manage.

upvoted 0 times

Noel

7 days ago

I think having a separate rendering host application for each site (Option B) could get messy. Option C sounds more organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

26 days ago

Option C is definitely the most efficient approach. Using the JSS multisite feature makes it easier to manage different regions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sol

2 months ago

I see both points, but I think option C is more scalable in the long run. It simplifies management with a single rendering host application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilford

2 months ago

Option C seems like the most efficient approach to me. Using the JSS multisite feature in a single rendering host application would allow for better management and scalability across the different regions.

upvoted 0 times

Cassandra

25 days ago

Yeah, deploying a rendering host application for each site seems like it would be more work in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crissy

1 months ago

Using separate instances of XM Cloud for each brand and country might get too complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

1 months ago

I agree, having a single rendering host application with the JSS multisite feature sounds like the most efficient approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noe

1 months ago

I think option C is the best choice. It would make managing the different regional sites much easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salome

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option A is better. Using separate instances of XM Cloud for each brand and country ensures better separation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melita

2 months ago

I think option C is the most efficient approach. It allows for a single rendering host application with the JSS multisite feature.

upvoted 0 times

...