Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Sitecore-10-NET-Developer Exam - Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

In a non-SXA multisite implementation, what is the recommended practice for storing reusable content that is shared between the different sites?
A) You should create a folder on each site and use cloning for this type of content.
B) It is not a recommended practice to share content between sites.
C) You should store this type of content outside of any one site's content tree structure.
D) Location does not matter because content can be retrieved from anywhere.

Sitecore-10-NET-Developer Exam - Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Sitecore's Sitecore-10-NET-Developer exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 2
[All Sitecore-10-NET-Developer Questions]

In a non-SXA multisite implementation, what is the recommended practice for storing reusable content that is shared between the different sites?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Nathan
6 months ago
I’m not sure about D, seems like location does matter for organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
6 months ago
Cloning content on each site? That sounds like a hassle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
7 months ago
Wait, are we really not supposed to share content? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
7 months ago
Totally agree, keeping it outside the content tree makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
7 months ago
I think option C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
7 months ago
I vaguely remember that location matters for content retrieval, but I can't remember the specifics about how it should be organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we talked about cloning content, but I can't recall if that's the best approach for multisite setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
8 months ago
I feel like we discussed how sharing content between sites isn't really recommended, but that doesn't seem to fit this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
8 months ago
I think I remember that storing reusable content outside of a site's content tree is a good practice, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
8 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. I'll select option C as the recommended practice for storing reusable content across multiple sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the best approach here. I'll need to double-check the guidelines for managing shared content in a non-SXA setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
8 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this. I'll go with option C and store the shared content outside of the individual site's content tree.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
8 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the best way to store shared content between sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to review the recommended practices for content sharing in a non-SXA implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. I remember learning about AH, IP, ESP, and IKE as the main IPsec protocols. I'll make sure to select those in the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
1 year ago
Option A sounds like a recipe for disaster. Cloning content? No thank you, I'd rather not end up in a content nightmare.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option C as well. It just makes sense to have a dedicated space for reusable content. Plus, it keeps the site trees nice and tidy.
upvoted 0 times
Jamey
11 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice for managing shared content across multiple sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
11 months ago
I think it's important to keep the site structure clean and easy to navigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
12 months ago
I agree, having a separate location for reusable content just makes everything more organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nicolette
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old debate of centralized vs. decentralized content storage. Option D makes me chuckle - 'location doesn't matter' is a bit too simplistic, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Option B seems a bit extreme, but I can see the merits of keeping content separate. Maybe a hybrid approach could work?
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
12 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Option B seems a bit extreme, but I can see the merits of keeping content separate. Maybe a hybrid approach could work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
12 months ago
C) You should store this type of content outside of any one site's content tree structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
1 year ago
A) You should create a folder on each site and use cloning for this type of content.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delisa
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Storing shared content outside the site tree makes it easier to manage and maintain across multiple sites.
upvoted 0 times
Jesus
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Storing shared content outside the site tree makes it easier to manage and maintain across multiple sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
1 year ago
C) You should store this type of content outside of any one site's content tree structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salome
1 year ago
I disagree. I think we should create a folder on each site and use cloning for shared content. It keeps everything organized and easily accessible within each site.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
1 year ago
I agree with Nu. Storing reusable content outside of any specific site makes it easier to manage and share between different sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 year ago
I think the recommended practice is to store the content outside of any one site's content tree structure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel