MENU
The Vulnerability Admin role (sn_vul.admin) can modify Vulnerability Application Properties and can be delegated to the following role(s):
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CIS-VR Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
NO
Norah
12 months ago
Yeah, I think they should limit the delegation options.
EU
Eun
12 months ago
Wait, all of the above? That seems too broad!
GE
Gertude
1 year ago
I thought it could only delegate to sn_vul_resp.admin.
GL
Glory
1 year ago
Totally agree, it's all about security!
MI
Micheline
1 year ago
The Vulnerability Admin role can delegate to sn_sec.admin, right?
KA
Karl
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards E, but I’m not completely confident. I just can’t recall if any of these roles are actually allowed to modify those properties.
KA
Kattie
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I thought the Security Admin role had some overlap with vulnerability management. Could it be B?
FR
Frankie
1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like all of these roles could potentially be delegated. Maybe it's D?
CH
Chanel
1 year ago
I think the Vulnerability Response Admin role might be the right answer since it seems closely related to vulnerabilities.
LU
Lucina
1 year ago
The part about importing a Virtual Connect domain without disrupting servers sounds important. I'll make sure I understand the implications of that.
SH
Shaniqua
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. We need a TIBCO component that can work with a JDBC interface to update a database. I think option B, Active Matrix BusinessWorks, sounds like the right choice here. I'll mark that one down.
NA
Nada
1 year ago
Option B, "Enables dynamic traffic engineering services," sounds like it could be the correct answer. I'll need to think through the details to confirm.