MENU
Why would you set Choice Action to Ignore on a transform field map?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CIS-SP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Setting the Choice Action to ''Ignore'' on a transform field map in ServiceNow is used to avoid inserting dummy referenced records into the global domain. When importing data, if the system encounters a reference field value that does not match any existing records, setting the Choice Action to ''Ignore'' will prevent the creation of a new, potentially incorrect record. Instead, the system will skip the field and leave it blank, ensuring data integrity and avoiding the clutter of unnecessary records.
For more detailed information, you can refer to the following resources:
* ServiceNow Support Article on Transform Maps
* Choice Action Field in ServiceNow
34 comments · newest first
MO
Mollie
11 months ago
D seems off; it’s not about scripting here.
LA
Lavera
11 months ago
C is not the answer; it’s about avoiding dummy records.
JA
Jamal
11 months ago
Wait, can you really ignore choice actions? Sounds risky!
CH
Chantell
12 months ago
I think B makes more sense, though.
ST
Stephen
12 months ago
A is definitely the right choice!
GE
Gene
1 year ago
Transforming field values with a script sounds familiar, but I don't think that's related to the Ignore action in this context.
SH
Sharen
1 year ago
I feel like rejecting new rows without choice values makes sense, but I can't recall if that's the main reason for using Ignore.
JA
Jaime
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we had to decide on actions for missing values, and I think ignoring them was a way to keep the data clean.
MA
Matt
1 year ago
I think setting Choice Action to Ignore might be to avoid inserting dummy records, but I'm not entirely sure.
DE
Devora
1 year ago
I've got a strategy for this - I'll focus on understanding the purpose of the "Ignore" setting and how it relates to the transform field map.
LE
Leah
1 year ago
Interesting question. I'm going to read through the options and see if I can figure out the best approach.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. I believe it's to reject new rows that don't have the necessary choice values.
SH
Sharika
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I think it might have something to do with avoiding inserting dummy records, but I'm not totally sure.
SH
Shawnda
1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think it through carefully.
TI
Titus
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure this has to do with overfitting, but I'm a bit confused about how including redundant variables would affect the parameter estimates and overfitting risk.
MA
Malcolm
2 years ago
I agree with Ira, A makes the most sense in this scenario.
IR
Ira
2 years ago
But setting Choice Action to Ignore would avoid inserting dummy referenced records into global, which is what option A says.
TR
Trevor
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's B.
IR
Ira
2 years ago
I think the answer is A.
EM
Emerson
2 years ago
I agree with Lenna, A makes sense because we don't want unnecessary data in the global table.
LE
Lenna
2 years ago
But setting Choice Action to Ignore would avoid inserting dummy referenced records into global, right?
CO
Cordell
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
DO
Dominque
2 years ago
Haha, these certification questions can be tricky! I'm going to go with A - can't have those pesky dummy records messing up my data, right?
JU
Julene
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'd want to know more about the specific use case before deciding. Maybe C could work too?
NA
Naomi
2 years ago
I agree, maybe option C could also work depending on the situation.
UL
Ulysses
2 years ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to consider the specific use case before making a decision.
AS
Asha
2 years ago
I think setting Choice Action to Ignore is to avoid inserting dummy referenced records into global.
ME
Merissa
2 years ago
D seems like the right choice to me. Transforming field values with a script is a common use case for this setting.
FA
Fausto
2 years ago
I think option B makes the most sense. Ignoring choice values seems like a good way to handle missing data.
KE
Kenneth
2 years ago
True, it really depends on the specific scenario and what you're trying to achieve with the transform field map.
FI
Fidelia
2 years ago
I think option A is more about avoiding unnecessary records in the global.
BE
Beatriz
2 years ago
But what about option A? Could that also be a valid reason to set Choice Action to Ignore?
DE
Denna
2 years ago
I agree, option B is a good way to handle missing data.
LE
Lenna
2 years ago
I think the answer is A.