ServiceNow CIS-SP Exam - Topic 4 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SP exam

Question #: 2
Topic #: 4

Given TOP as a parent domain for MSP, ACME, and Initech, and MSP contains TOP What additional domain configuration is required for UserA in MSP to read records in ACME?

AAdd contains between MSP and ACME

BAdd both visibility to ACME for UserA, and contains between MSP and ACME

CAdd visibility to ACME for UserA

DNo additional configurations

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

In ServiceNow, domain separation is used to manage data visibility and access control in a multi-tenant environment1. The 'contains' relationship in domain separation defines a hierarchy where a parent domain contains child domains, and by default, users in a parent domain can see the records in child domains1.

Given that TOP is the parent domain for MSP, ACME, and Initech, and MSP contains TOP, UserA in MSP would already have visibility into TOP. However, for UserA to read records in ACME, additional configuration is required because ACME is not a child domain of MSP by default.

The correct action is to add visibility to ACME for UserA . This is typically done by configuring the user's domain membership or by adjusting the domain visibility settings to include ACME for UserA. This ensures that UserA can access records in ACME while still being primarily associated with the MSP domain1.

The 'contains' relationship between MSP and ACME (A) is not necessary because it would imply a hierarchical relationship that does not reflect the given structure. Adding both visibility to ACME for UserA and contains between MSP and ACME (B) is also not required and could potentially create an incorrect domain hierarchy. No additional configurations (D) would not suffice as it would not grant UserA the access needed to read records in ACME.

by Virgilio at Jul 17, 2024, 04:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-SP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Melodie

3 months ago

Just adding visibility should be enough, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristine

4 months ago

No way, option D is not correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

4 months ago

Wait, can UserA really access ACME without extra configs?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonette

4 months ago

Definitely option B! Both visibility and contains are needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

4 months ago

You need visibility for UserA in ACME.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

5 months ago

I don't think any additional configurations are needed, but I could be mixing this up with another topic we covered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

5 months ago

I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m a bit uncertain if just adding visibility is enough without the containment part.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilson

5 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to set up visibility and containment. I feel like both might be necessary for UserA to access ACME.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

5 months ago

I remember something about visibility settings being crucial for access, but I'm not sure if that's all that's needed here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

5 months ago

This seems straightforward. I'm pretty confident the answer is option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannon

5 months ago

Ah, I see now. The solution is to add both visibility to ACME for Willard and the contains relationship between MSP and ACME.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fanny

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Let me re-read the question and think through the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is understanding the contains relationship between MSP and ACME.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the domain relationships and permissions required.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on the "durable" aspect of the question. That's likely pointing to the "durableQueueSize" option as the best choice to mitigate data loss.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amina

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

6 months ago

Okay, let's see. I think the key is to confirm the data type on the procedure automation input parameter, as well as the proxy's data type. That should help me identify where the issue is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coletta

2 years ago

This question is making my head spin with all these domain names! Gotta love IT jargon. Anyway, I'm leaning towards B as well.

upvoted 0 times

Virgina

1 year ago

Definitely, those additional configurations should do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josefa

2 years ago

Agreed, and adding contains between MSP and ACME would help too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryan

2 years ago

Yeah, adding visibility to ACME for UserA makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

2 years ago

I think B is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harley

2 years ago

Haha, I bet the exam writer was just trying to confuse us with all these domain relationships. But I think B is the answer they're looking for.

upvoted 0 times

Ellen

2 years ago

Yeah, adding visibility to ACME for UserA and contains between MSP and ACME should do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jonell

2 years ago

I agree, B seems like the right choice to give UserA access to ACME.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

2 years ago

I'd go with D. No additional configurations are required if the parent-child relationship is already set up correctly between the domains.

upvoted 0 times

Karima

2 years ago

D it is then, thanks for the clarification!

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

2 years ago

Agreed, if the parent-child relationship is in place, UserA should be able to read records in ACME.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

2 years ago

I think D is the right choice, no need for extra configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

2 years ago

I think D) No additional configurations is the correct answer, as UserA should already have access to read records in ACME.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evelynn

2 years ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) Add visibility to ACME for UserA could also be a valid option.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

2 years ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Add both visibility to ACME for UserA, and contains between MSP and ACME.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

2 years ago

Choice B seems like the right way to go. You need to grant visibility to ACME for UserA and also establish the 'contains' relationship between MSP and ACME.

upvoted 0 times