Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ServiceNow Exam CIS-SP Topic 3 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SP exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 3
[All CIS-SP Questions]

A System Administrator wants to setup their domain hierarchy in a new instance, which practice should they follow when creating the structure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Best practices for setting up a domain hierarchy in ServiceNow recommend creating a structure that is not too shallow or too deep. A hierarchy that is 3-5 layers deep is considered optimal as it allows for the use of 'contains' relationships where necessary12. This structure should include a default domain, which typically serves as the catch-all layer for any data that does not belong to a more specific domain3. The default domain is often the TOP domain or a domain just below it. This setup facilitates better organization and management of data and processes across different domains within the instance45.


by Roy at Sep 15, 2024, 07:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-SP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ernest
10 months ago
Adding several layers below the TOP domain seems overkill to me. Keep it simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
10 months ago
Haha, a totally flat domain hierarchy? That sounds like a recipe for disaster! Gotta have some structure, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Artie
9 months ago
C) A domain heirarchy 3-5 layers deep that allows for use of contains if needed and does not contain a defualt domain
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
10 months ago
B) Using Service Offerings in the domain hierarchy
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
10 months ago
A) A domain heirarchy 3-5 layers deep that allows for use of contains if needed and contains a defualt domain
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilberto
10 months ago
I'm not sure about the 'contains' part. Wouldn't that make the structure more complex than necessary?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
10 months ago
That's a valid point, but I still think having a default domain like in option A is more organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better because it allows for flexibility without a default domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
I agree with Billye. The default domain is also a nice feature to have in the hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
Layla
9 months ago
I prefer having a default domain in the hierarchy as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
9 months ago
C) A domain heirarchy 3-5 layers deep that allows for use of contains if needed and does not contain a defualt domain
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
9 months ago
A) A domain heirarchy 3-5 layers deep that allows for use of contains if needed and contains a defualt domain
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernardo
10 months ago
I think option A is the best practice for setting up the domain hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
11 months ago
Option A seems the most logical choice for setting up a domain hierarchy. Allowing for up to 5 layers and the use of 'contains' is a good practice.
upvoted 0 times
Dong
10 months ago
C) A domain heirarchy 3-5 layers deep that allows for use of contains if needed and does not contain a defualt domain
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
10 months ago
Option A seems like the best choice for setting up the domain hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
10 months ago
A) A domain heirarchy 3-5 layers deep that allows for use of contains if needed and contains a defualt domain
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel