Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow Exam CIS-SM Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SM exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 4
[All CIS-SM Questions]

Assuming the Apache Web Server Identification Rule (CI Identifier) is configured as shown with the following

Criterion attributes:

Class

Configuration file

Version

Yesterday, an Apache Web Server CI was discovered as part of Service Mapping. Today, the application owner upgraded the Apache Web Server to a different version and reran discovery of the service. What will happen in the CMDB?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lawrence
23 days ago
I bet the application owner is wishing they had a crystal ball to see the future and know which version of Apache to upgrade to. But hey, at least the CMDB is there to save the day with option C. It's like the CI version control superhero, keeping everything in check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
24 days ago
Ah, the age-old question of the Apache Web Server CI. Of course, option C is the correct answer. The CMDB is like a digital librarian, keeping track of all the different versions and reconciling the changes. I just hope the application owner didn't accidentally upgrade to the 'Spicy Salsa' version of Apache instead of the 'Mild Guacamole' one.
upvoted 0 times
Domonique
3 days ago
I agree, option C is definitely the correct answer. The CMDB will reconcile the changes and update the version.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
1 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think C is the right answer. The CMDB should be able to handle the version upgrade and update the existing CI. Although, I'm curious if the application owner used the 'Upgrade to the Latest Version' button or if they did a manual update. Either way, the CMDB should be on top of it.
upvoted 0 times
Cassandra
4 days ago
I agree, C seems like the most logical option. The CMDB should reconcile the existing CI with the upgraded version.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carri
2 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking the new version would create a duplicate, but option C makes sense. The CMDB is smart enough to reconcile the changes and update the existing CI. Though I wonder if the application owner remembered to clear the cache before running the discovery again...
upvoted 0 times
Hyun
3 days ago
I hope the application owner cleared the cache before rerunning the discovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
7 days ago
I agree, the CMDB is designed to handle updates like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
21 days ago
Option C is correct. The CMDB will reconcile the changes and update the existing CI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
23 days ago
Yes, the reconciliation process is crucial for maintaining data integrity in the CMDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
27 days ago
It's important to keep the CMDB accurate and up to date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
1 months ago
Hopefully the application owner did remember to clear the cache before rerunning the discovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most logical outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catherin
2 months ago
Ah, I see. The key here is that the application owner upgraded the Apache Web Server to a different version and reran discovery. So option C is correct - the existing Apache Web Server CI will be reconciled with the upgraded version, and its version will be updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think a duplication error might occur if the CI is not properly reconciled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
I agree with Salina. It makes sense to update the version instead of creating a new CI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
2 months ago
I think the existing Apache Web Server CI will be reconciled with the upgraded version.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel