New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ServiceNow CIS-SM Exam - Topic 3 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SM exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 3
[All CIS-SM Questions]

In Service Mapping, which one of the following is true if a target host is already discovered and in the CMDB?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lili at Oct 17, 2022, 07:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-SM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tomoko
4 months ago
No way, A is totally wrong! The host shouldn't be deleted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
4 months ago
B sounds right too, only changes get updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought it might be D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
5 months ago
Definitely agree with C! Makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
5 months ago
I think option C is correct. The host gets updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
5 months ago
I thought it was A at first, but now I’m questioning if it really deletes the old record. I need to double-check how updates work in Service Mapping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards D because I recall something about not rediscovering hosts that are already in the CMDB, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I feel like it was about how existing records are handled. Maybe B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
5 months ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure if it updates immediately or just at the end of the discovery process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
5 months ago
Okay, so the marketing department has already picked a CMS, but the legal department is mandating a new one. I'd probably try to get everyone on the same page and validate the chosen solution meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
6 months ago
INSERT is definitely a DML statement, so I'm going to go with option A. The others seem to be more about schema changes than data manipulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
10 months ago
This question is like a game of hide-and-seek with the CMDB. Option C sounds like the host is the one who's always 'it', and the CMDB just wants to keep track of where it's been.
upvoted 0 times
Helaine
9 months ago
Definitely, option C seems to be the most logical choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
9 months ago
I agree, it's like a never-ending game of hide-and-seek between the host and the CMDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
9 months ago
Yeah, it's like the CMDB is constantly trying to keep track of the host's movements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
9 months ago
I think option C makes sense, the host is always being rediscovered and updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sarah
10 months ago
Interesting. The CMDB is like a forgetful grandparent - it might not even remember that it's already discovered those hosts. I'll have to keep that in mind.
upvoted 0 times
Rachael
9 months ago
Interesting analogy! The CMDB does seem to have a bit of memory loss sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
9 months ago
C) The host will be immediately rediscovered and updated in the CMDB during Service Mapping discovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
9 months ago
A) The host will be deleted in the CMDB and a new host record will be created during Service Mapping discovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lucina
10 months ago
Aha! The CMDB is like a digital scrapbook - it wants to preserve every detail about those hosts, even if they've been discovered before. Option C seems to be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Reta
9 months ago
User 3: I agree, it's like keeping a digital record of everything that's been discovered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, the CMDB wants to keep all the details, so it makes sense that it would update the host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
9 months ago
User 1: I think option C is correct, the host will be immediately rediscovered and updated in the CMDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ezekiel
10 months ago
Hmm, the CMDB is like a protective parent - it wants to keep track of all its children, even if they've grown up and moved out. Option C sounds like the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Van
9 months ago
Definitely, the CMDB wants to stay in the loop with all its hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
10 months ago
Yeah, option C makes sense. It's all about keeping things updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
10 months ago
I agree, the CMDB is like a watchful parent.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Twanna
11 months ago
Ah, I see. So the CMDB is like a digital hoarder's collection - it won't let go of those hosts, even if they've been discovered before. This'll be a tricky one to remember.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's either B or C. We should consider the efficiency of updating the CMDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
11 months ago
I agree with Hermila, because it makes sense to update the host in the CMDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
11 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel