Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ServiceNow CIS-RCI Exam - Topic 4 Question 76 Discussion

A control objective has been related to a risk statement and they've been scoped with the same entity type. What can we expect to occur?
A) Risks for this risk statement will be moved back into a Review state since there are new factors impacting risk likelihood.
B) A control for this control objective, with a matching entity, will be related to the registered risk for this risk statement as a mitigating control.
C) The control objective will be marked as compliant since it is mitigating the related risk statement.
D) Risk scores will automatically decrease for the risk statement's risks since there are now mitigating controls.

ServiceNow CIS-RCI Exam - Topic 4 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-RCI exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 4
[All CIS-RCI Questions]

A control objective has been related to a risk statement and they've been scoped with the same entity type. What can we expect to occur?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

by Staci at Oct 19, 2024, 09:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-RCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Corinne
9 months ago
D sounds too optimistic, not all risks will see score drops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
10 months ago
Totally agree with B, that's how it should work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
10 months ago
Surprised that A isn't the answer, new factors usually change things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
10 months ago
I think C is a bit misleading, compliance isn't automatic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherron
10 months ago
B seems right, controls should relate to risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
11 months ago
I recall that when controls are added, it doesn't always mean risks automatically decrease. So, I wonder if option A could be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
11 months ago
I feel like this is similar to a practice question we did where controls were linked to risks. I think option C sounds plausible, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about how controls can affect risk scores. Could it be option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
11 months ago
I think if the control objective and risk statement are scoped together, it might mean that the control can actually help mitigate the risk. So, maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options seem a bit tricky, and I don't want to overthink it. I'll just go with my best guess and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. If a control objective is related to a risk statement with the same entity, then a control should be created to mitigate that risk. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to re-read the question and the answer choices a few times to make sure I understand what's being asked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the relationship between control objectives and risk statements. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
1 year ago
I'm going with Option B. It makes the most sense in terms of the relationship between the control objective and the risk statement.
upvoted 0 times
Yen
1 year ago
User 3: Option B it is then, let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
1 year ago
User 3: Option B it is then, let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, it seems like the control objective and risk statement are closely related.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, it seems like the control objective and risk statement are closely related.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
1 year ago
User 1: I think Option B is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
1 year ago
User 1: I think Option B is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
1 year ago
Haha, Option D sounds like wishful thinking. Risk scores don't just magically decrease because a control has been put in place. That's not how it works in the real world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the other options, but I think C is definitely wrong. The control objective being compliant doesn't necessarily mean the related risks have been mitigated.
upvoted 0 times
Beth
1 year ago
True, I agree. Let's go with option B then, it seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Option A seems unlikely though, moving risks back into Review state doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
1 year ago
But what about option D? Won't the risk scores decrease with mitigating controls in place?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
1 year ago
I think B is the correct option. The control objective and risk statement will be related with a mitigating control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alysa
1 year ago
Option B seems like the correct answer here. A control related to the control objective should be linked as a mitigating control for the associated risk statement.
upvoted 0 times
Micheal
1 year ago
Yes, linking a control as a mitigating control for the associated risk statement is crucial for managing risks effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
1 year ago
I agree, option B makes the most sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Azalee
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D because having mitigating controls should decrease risk scores.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
1 year ago
I agree with Veronique, because having a control related to the registered risk makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel