MENU
If a Message Key is not provided, which fields are concatenated to make our own?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CIS-EM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
FA
Fabiola
10 months ago
Not sure about that, seems a bit off to me.
SH
Shawnda
10 months ago
Wait, is it really that? I thought it included DNS.
DI
Dierdre
11 months ago
I thought it was Source, DNS, Node, Additional info, Metric Name.
JA
Jaime
11 months ago
It's definitely Source, Type, Node, Resource, Metric Name.
NI
Nickole
11 months ago
Totally agree with Jaime on this one!
RA
Raymon
11 months ago
I thought it was Source, Source Instance, and Type, but now I'm second-guessing myself.
BE
Becky
11 months ago
I feel like DNS was mentioned in our notes, but I can't recall if it was part of the concatenation process.
HO
Hortencia
12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think it was Source, Type, Node, and Metric Name that we used.
MO
Mozelle
12 months ago
I think we discussed something about concatenating fields, but I'm not sure if it's Source and Type or something else.
VI
Virgie
1 year ago
Ah, I think I know the answer. It's C - Source, Type, DNS, Additional info, and Metric Name. I'm pretty confident about that.
PA
Paris
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure which fields are concatenated. I'll have to review my notes and try to figure this out.
IR
Irving
1 year ago
I've got this! The answer is definitely A. I remember we learned that those are the fields that get concatenated when a Message Key is not provided.
CA
Catalina
1 year ago
Okay, let me see... I think the answer is C, but I'm not 100% sure. I'll double-check the options and try to remember what we covered in class.
DE
Delila
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different fields and how they might be concatenated.
ME
Melodie
1 year ago
I'm with Bulah on this one. The DNS field is clutch when you don't have a Message Key. C gets my vote.
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
Haha, this reminds me of that time I accidentally used the wrong field and my alerts were a total mess. Option C is the way to go.
ST
Stevie
1 year ago
I think Option C is definitely correct! Good call.
RE
Reiko
1 year ago
I had the same issue once! Option A messed up my whole report.
KI
Kiley
1 year ago
Yeah, mistakes can be brutal. I've been there too!
MA
Maynard
1 year ago
For sure! Gotta double-check those fields next time.
BU
Bulah
1 year ago
Option A looks good too, but I think C covers all the bases. Gotta have that DNS info!
AR
Arlen
1 year ago
I agree, having the DNS info is crucial for creating the Message Key.
TA
Talia
1 year ago
I think D) Source, Source Instance, Node, Type, Resource could also be a possibility.
NI
Nieves
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) Source, Type, DNS, Additional info, Metric Name.
JA
Janine
1 year ago
I agree with Barbra, those fields make sense to concatenate.
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Source, Type, Node, Resource, Metric Name.
DO
Doyle
1 year ago
If a Message Key is not provided, I would go with option C. Seems like the most comprehensive set of fields to create our own key.
WA
Wai
1 year ago
I think option A could also work well, but option C does cover more fields.
ID
Idella
1 year ago
I agree, option C does seem like the best choice for creating our own key.
LI
Lilli
1 year ago
I would go with option D, it includes important fields for creating a unique key.
EU
Eura
1 year ago
I think option A could also work well for concatenating fields if a Message Key is not provided.
LA
Lashon
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for creating our own key.