Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ServiceNow CIS-EM Exam - Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

How would you ensure the quality of data in your Configuration Management Database (CMDB) over time?
D) Having well-defined Identification, Reconciliation, and Relationship rules
A) Manually inventorying configuration items in the CMDB and eliminating duplicate configuration items (CIs)
B) Only use the ServiceNow Discovery application to populate your CMDB
C) Using only scripts to automatically monitor for and remediate duplicate configuration items (CIs)

ServiceNow CIS-EM Exam - Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-EM exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 1
[All CIS-EM Questions]

How would you ensure the quality of data in your Configuration Management Database (CMDB) over time?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Billye at Mar 31, 2023, 08:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-EM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Willetta
7 months ago
D has been my go-to for years, can’t go wrong with solid rules!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
7 months ago
Wait, can scripts really handle all duplicates? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
8 months ago
A sounds like a lot of manual work, not efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
8 months ago
I think B is too limiting, we need more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
8 months ago
D is definitely the way to go for long-term quality!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
8 months ago
I vaguely recall that using tools like ServiceNow Discovery is helpful, but it shouldn't be the only method. I think option B might overlook some important aspects of data quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
8 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this where we emphasized the need for manual checks alongside automation. I feel like option A might be too limited on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think just relying on automated scripts for monitoring duplicates could lead to issues. Maybe a combination of methods is needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
8 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having clear rules for identification and reconciliation in our CMDB. It seems like option D might be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'm not sure if enabling infrastructure encryption or rotating the storage keys would meet the requirement to use block blob storage. I'll need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the importance of enabling event log storage. I'll focus on understanding the key reasons and relating them to the answer options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this question. Is the Task Breakdown also a valid answer, or is the Burndown Chart the only correct choice? I'll have to review my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azalee
9 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The maintenance and support requirement seems like the most logical "not a drawback" option here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel