Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow CIS-DF Exam - Topic 4 Question 1 Discussion

The following identification rule for a Hardware CI class has been definedTwo new CI records are imported into the Hardware class of the CMDB:CI1: The name of this CI record matches the name of an existing CI record in the CMDB.CI2: The IP address of this CI record matches the IP address of an existing CI record in the CMDB.Which is correct based on the identification rule and the imported CI records?
B) CI1 and CI2 both will be inserted as new records
A) CI1 will be inserted as a new record and CI2 will be updated with the matching record
C) CI1 will be updated with the matching record and CI2 will be inserted as a new record
D) CI1 and CI2 both will be updated with matching records

ServiceNow CIS-DF Exam - Topic 4 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-DF exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 4
[All CIS-DF Questions]

The following identification rule for a Hardware CI class has been defined

Two new CI records are imported into the Hardware class of the CMDB:

CI1: The name of this CI record matches the name of an existing CI record in the CMDB.

CI2: The IP address of this CI record matches the IP address of an existing CI record in the CMDB.

Which is correct based on the identification rule and the imported CI records?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (200--300 words):

This question tests understanding of how the Identification and Reconciliation Engine (IRE) evaluates incoming CI data against Identification Rules and their priority order in ServiceNow.

From the identification rule shown:

Serial number (+ type) Priority 100

Serial number Priority 200

Name (Hardware) Priority 300

MAC address + name (Network Adapter) Priority 400

For a CI to be identified and matched, the incoming record must satisfy one complete identifier entry exactly as defined for that class.

CI1 (Name match only)

Although the name matches an existing Hardware CI, name alone is a low-priority identifier (300) and is not sufficient to uniquely identify a Hardware CI unless no higher-priority identifiers exist and the identifier entry criteria are fully satisfied. In practice, Hardware identification relies on serial number--based identifiers, not name-only matching, to avoid false positives. Therefore, CI1 cannot be confidently matched and is inserted as a new record.

CI2 (IP address match)

IP address is not part of any Hardware identification rule shown. IP address is typically used for discovery correlation or network relationships, not as a primary Hardware identifier. Since no identifier entry includes IP address, CI2 does not match any valid identification rule and is also inserted as a new record.

Because neither CI satisfies a valid identifier entry, both records are inserted as new CIs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tamra
4 days ago
Option A seems wrong. Both should not be new records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
9 days ago
I’m leaning towards option C. CI1 updates, CI2 is new.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
15 days ago
Agreed! CI2 should be new since only the IP matches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
20 days ago
I think CI1 will be updated. It matches an existing record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
25 days ago
No way, CI2 should update the existing one too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 month ago
I think both CI1 and CI2 will be treated as new records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
1 month ago
Wait, are we sure about CI2 being a new record?
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
1 month ago
Totally agree, CI1 will definitely be updated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
2 months ago
CI1 matches an existing record, so it should be updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
2 months ago
I doubt both will be inserted as new records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 months ago
I’m surprised they both don’t just get updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
2 months ago
Wait, what about CI2? It has a matching IP too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
2 months ago
Totally agree, CI1 should not be a new record!
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
2 months ago
CI1 matches an existing record, so it should be updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
3 months ago
Both records can't be new; that's not how it works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
4 months ago
Definitely going with option C! Makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
4 months ago
I think CI2 will just be a new record since the IP is unique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
5 months ago
CI1 matches an existing name, so it should be updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
Based on what I practiced, I believe CI1 will be updated and CI2 will be a new record, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the IP address rule. Does it mean CI2 will be updated or inserted?
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
5 months ago
I remember a similar question where matching names led to updates, so I feel like CI1 will definitely be updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
5 months ago
I think CI1 should be updated since the name matches an existing record, but I'm not sure about CI2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
5 months ago
Based on what I practiced, I believe CI1 will be updated and CI2 will be a new record, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused; does the IP address match mean CI2 gets updated or inserted? I need to double-check that rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
6 months ago
I remember a similar question where matching names led to updates, so I feel like CI1 will be updated too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
6 months ago
I think CI1 should be updated since it matches an existing record, but I'm not sure about CI2.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel