New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile SAFe-SPC Exam - Topic 2 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SPC exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 2
[All SAFe-SPC Questions]

You organization decided to thoroughly implement the SAFe Principle "Assume variability; preserve options." What is the optimum path for success?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Alesia
3 months ago
Wait, preserving options sounds great, but can we really pull it off?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
3 months ago
Option A seems risky, but could work if managed well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
3 months ago
Not so sure about that, fixed solutions can help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
4 months ago
Totally agree, flexibility is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
4 months ago
I think option D makes the most sense for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
4 months ago
I vaguely remember a similar question where we talked about balancing scope and context, but I can't decide between B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
4 months ago
I feel like option A might be too focused on release dates, but I can't recall if that's the best approach for variability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
5 months ago
I think option D sounds right because it emphasizes flexibility in both functionality and design, which aligns with what we practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
5 months ago
I remember discussing how preserving options is crucial, but I'm not sure if it means we should fix the solution intent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option D is the right answer here. Preserving flexibility in both areas is the best way to implement the "Assume variability; preserve options" principle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to preserve flexibility in both the system functionality and design, so I'm going with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Let me re-read it a few times to make sure I understand what they're asking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the SAFe principles carefully to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
This is a good test of our understanding of SAFe. I'll make sure to review the principles before the exam to be prepared for questions like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
5 months ago
Ah yes, I remember now. Containers are all about packaging and deploying applications consistently across different environments. And they're more resource-efficient than VMs. Those are the two key problems they solve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
10 months ago
Hey, I heard that 'assuming variability' is like assuming your coworker will forget to refill the coffee pot. Might as well just make your own brew, right?
upvoted 0 times
Rosalind
9 months ago
C) Assume variability of scope, but have fixed Solution Context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
9 months ago
B) Preserve flexibility in system functionality and design, but have fixed Solution intent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
9 months ago
C) Assume variability of scope, but have fixed Solution Context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
9 months ago
B) Preserve flexibility in system functionality and design, but have fixed Solution intent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
10 months ago
A) Assume variability of scope and preserve options for the release date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
10 months ago
A) Assume variability of scope and preserve options for the release date.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alva
10 months ago
I'm going with D. Gotta keep those options open, baby! Variety is the spice of life, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
10 months ago
Option C looks good to me. Assuming variability of scope while having a fixed solution context seems like a balanced approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. Preserving flexibility in the system functionality and design seems ideal, but I don't want to completely ignore the solution intent either.
upvoted 0 times
Martin
8 months ago
Let's go with D then. It's important to preserve flexibility in both system functionality and design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
8 months ago
I agree with you, D seems like the best option for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
8 months ago
I see your point, but I believe D is the better choice. Flexibility in both functionality and design is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
9 months ago
I think B is the way to go. It's important to have a fixed Solution intent.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
11 months ago
I see both points, but I think preserving flexibility in system functionality and design, but having fixed Solution intent (B) strikes a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's better to preserve flexibility in both system functionality and design (D).
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
11 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Preserving flexibility in both system functionality and design aligns perfectly with the SAFe principle of 'Assume variability; preserve options'.
upvoted 0 times
Mozell
9 months ago
That makes sense, it's all about finding the right balance between flexibility and stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
9 months ago
I see your point, but having flexibility in both functionality and design can lead to better outcomes in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
10 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to have a fixed Solution Context to provide some stability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
10 months ago
I agree, option D allows for adaptability while still having a clear solution intent.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daniela
11 months ago
I think the best path is to assume variability of scope and preserve options for the release date (A).
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel