Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-DevOps Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe DevOps Practitioner Exam SDP (6.0) exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 4
[All SAFe DevOps Practitioner Exam SDP (6.0) Questions]

What is the purpose of a minimum viable product?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The purpose of a minimum viable product is to validate the hypothesis. A minimum viable product (MVP) is an early and minimal version of a new product or solution used to prove or disprove an epic hypothesis. An epic is a significant solution development initiative that requires the definition and approval of an MVP. An epic hypothesis is a statement that describes the expected outcome, benefit, and value of an epic. The MVP is the smallest possible solution that can be used to test the epic hypothesis with real customers or users, and to gather feedback and data. The MVP helps reduce the risk of investing in a solution that nobody wants or needs, and enables faster learning and adaptation.The MVP is not the final product or solution, but rather a starting point for further development and improvement


by Paris at Apr 14, 2024, 09:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-DevOps Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Amber
5 days ago
I'm with you all on this. Option C is the clear winner, but I'm curious to hear what everyone thinks about the other options. Are there any cases where you might want to demo to Product Management or sell to new markets with an MVP?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
7 days ago
Absolutely. The whole point of an MVP is to get in front of real customers and see if your assumptions hold up. That's the only way to build something that people actually want.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
8 days ago
Haha, yeah, option B is definitely the 'move fast and break things' approach. I'd much rather take the time to validate my ideas before unleashing them on the world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
9 days ago
You know, I'm surprised option B is even an option. Who in their right mind would just release an MVP to production without validating it first? That's a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
...
France
11 days ago
Agreed, option C is the clear winner here. An MVP is all about learning and testing your assumptions, not just showing off or making money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
13 days ago
I think this is a great question that really gets at the core of agile development. The purpose of an MVP is definitely to validate the hypothesis and get customer feedback, not to just demo to management or release to production.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel