Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-APM Topic 8 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-APM exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 8
[All SAFe-APM Questions]

When calculating Weighted Shortest Job First (WSJF), what action should be taken?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The most important planning question for primary research is what will be asked, because this determines the type, quality, and relevance of the data that will be collected. The research question or hypothesis should be specific, narrow, and discoverable through primary research methods, and it should align with the research purpose and objectives. The research question or hypothesis guides the choice of the research medium, the sample size and selection, and the data analysis and interpretation.


What is Primary Research?: This article from Purdue OWL defines primary research and explains the steps and considerations involved in planning and conducting primary research.

10.3: Planning Your Primary Research Project: This article from Humanities LibreTexts provides some tips and examples on how to plan a primary research project, including defining the research question or hypothesis, choosing the research method, and designing the research instrument.

by Nana at May 20, 2024, 05:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-APM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Brice
3 months ago
Wait, did someone say 'Fibonacci'? I thought this was a simple job prioritization technique, not a secret code from Da Vinci!
upvoted 0 times
Armando
2 months ago
C) Put each team in its own WSJF bucket
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
Wait, did someone say 'Fibonacci'? I thought this was a simple job prioritization technique, not a secret code from Da Vinci!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
B) Set your 'ceiling' in Fibonacci and work down to the lowest-scoring item
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
3 months ago
A) Execute one column at a time in full, then move on to the next
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brande
3 months ago
Hah, I can just imagine some poor soul trying to wrangle all the team WSJF buckets. Nah, I'm sticking with the classic individual sizing approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
4 months ago
Putting each team in its own bucket? That just sounds like a recipe for confusion. I'll have to go with D - it makes the most sense to size things individually first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
I prefer setting my 'ceiling' in Fibonacci and working down to the lowest-scoring item.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
4 months ago
B sounds like a weird way to do it. Fibonacci ceilings? Come on, this is WSJF, not some advanced math problem!
upvoted 0 times
Denae
3 months ago
C) Put each team in its own WSJF bucket
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
3 months ago
A) Execute one column at a time in full, then move on to the next
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rocco
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should execute one column at a time in full, then move on to the next.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
4 months ago
I think option A is the way to go - it's the most straightforward approach to WSJF. You tackle one column at a time instead of jumping around.
upvoted 0 times
Blythe
2 months ago
User 4: I think performing individual sizing by role first is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
3 months ago
User 3: Putting each team in its own WSJF bucket seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
3 months ago
User 2: I prefer setting my 'ceiling' in Fibonacci and working down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, tackling one column at a time makes it easier to focus.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Larae
4 months ago
I think we should put each team in its own WSJF bucket.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel