Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile SAFe-Agilist Exam - Topic 7 Question 46 Discussion

Posted by Kris on Jan 27, 2025 at 08:04 AM

The analyzing step of the Portfolio Kanban system has a new Epic with a completed Lean business case. What best describes the next step for the Epic?

Suggested Answer: A, B

Get Premium SAFe-Agilist Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
JE
Jesusita 11 months ago
I thought it would be implemented right away if it’s approved!
WI
William 11 months ago
I’m leaning towards D, but B seems more logical.
BU
Bulah 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it doesn't just stay in analyzing until capacity?
SU
Sue 11 months ago
Definitely agree with that! B is the way to go.
LO
Lorean 12 months ago
I think it goes to the Portfolio Backlog after a 'go' decision.
DI
Dick 12 months ago
I feel like it might stay in analyzing until there's capacity, but that doesn't seem right for a completed Lean business case.
LO
Lorean 12 months ago
If I remember correctly, the Epic should be moved to the Portfolio Backlog after a 'go' decision, but I might be mixing it up with another process.
CR
Cristy 1 year ago
I remember something about the Epic needing to be prioritized based on WSJF, but I can't recall if that happens before or after it moves to the backlog.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
I think the next step is to get approval from Lean Portfolio Management before moving it to the Portfolio Backlog, but I'm not entirely sure.
TR
Trina 1 year ago
The wording of this question is a bit tricky. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I'm interpreting it correctly.
TR
Tracey 1 year ago
I think the answer is B, but I'm not 100% sure. I'll double-check the details on the Portfolio Kanban process.
EL
Elza 1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The key is understanding the Portfolio Kanban system.
SA
Sabrina 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
ED
Edna 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I know the answer.
JO
Johnetta 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm going with Option B. Gotta love that Lean Portfolio Management decision! 'Go' or 'no-go' - that's the way to go!
LI
Lina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
Definitely, it helps prioritize and streamline the process.
YV
Yvonne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
I agree, Lean Portfolio Management is key in making those decisions.
TH
Theodora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
Option B) It will be moved to the Portfolio Backlog if it receives a 'go' decision from Lean Portfolio Management
WI
Willie 1 year ago
I don't know, Option A seems pretty straightforward. Get the Lean business case approved and then implement the Epic. Seems simple enough.
TI
Timothy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Willie
User 3: I agree, let's follow the process and get it approved before implementation.
AN
Anisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Willie
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to have that approval before moving forward.
FE
Felix 1 year ago
↳ replying to Willie
User 1: I think Option A is the way to go. Get that Lean business case approved first.
BA
Barbra 2 years ago
Option C is the way to go. The Epic should remain in the analyzing step until the Agile Release Trains have the capacity to implement it. Can't just jump the gun here!
RO
Rosendo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barbra
True, but we need to consider the overall capacity of the Agile Release Trains before implementation.
MA
Margery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barbra
But what if the Lean business case is already completed, shouldn't we move forward?
LO
Loise 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barbra
I think we should prioritize based on WSJF ranking to ensure maximum value.
LE
Leatha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barbra
I agree, it's important to wait for the Agile Release Trains to have capacity.
PA
Paris 2 years ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. If the Epic has the highest WSJF ranking, it should be implemented regardless of the other steps.
MA
Ma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User 2: Agreed, it's all about prioritizing based on value.
LI
Ligia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paris
User 1: I think Option D makes sense. Highest WSJF ranking should take priority.
BI
Billi 2 years ago
But what if it has the highest WSJF ranking? Shouldn't it be implemented then?
RE
Renato 2 years ago
Option B seems the most logical next step. Moving the Epic to the Portfolio Backlog once it receives a 'go' decision from Lean Portfolio Management makes the most sense.
WI
Willis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Renato
That way, we can ensure we are implementing the most valuable Epics first.
AN
Annelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Renato
Once it's in the Portfolio Backlog, we can prioritize it based on WSJF ranking.
JO
Jose 1 year ago
↳ replying to Renato
It's important to wait for the 'go' decision from Lean Portfolio Management before moving the Epic.
TI
Tiara 1 year ago
↳ replying to Renato
I agree, option B does seem like the most logical next step.
CA
Cassi 2 years ago
I agree with Curtis, it makes sense to wait for approval before moving forward with implementation.
CU
Curtis 2 years ago
I think the next step for the Epic is to be implemented once the Lean business case is approved by the Epic Owner.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel