Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-Agilist Topic 7 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-Agilist exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 7
[All SAFe-Agilist Questions]

The analyzing step of the Portfolio Kanban system has a new Epic with a completed Lean business case. What best describes the next step for the Epic?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Johnetta
29 days ago
Hmm, I'm going with Option B. Gotta love that Lean Portfolio Management decision! 'Go' or 'no-go' - that's the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Lina
7 days ago
Definitely, it helps prioritize and streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
9 days ago
I agree, Lean Portfolio Management is key in making those decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
20 days ago
Option B) It will be moved to the Portfolio Backlog if it receives a 'go' decision from Lean Portfolio Management
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willie
1 months ago
I don't know, Option A seems pretty straightforward. Get the Lean business case approved and then implement the Epic. Seems simple enough.
upvoted 0 times
Anisha
8 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to have that approval before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
26 days ago
User 1: I think Option A is the way to go. Get that Lean business case approved first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barbra
1 months ago
Option C is the way to go. The Epic should remain in the analyzing step until the Agile Release Trains have the capacity to implement it. Can't just jump the gun here!
upvoted 0 times
Rosendo
1 days ago
True, but we need to consider the overall capacity of the Agile Release Trains before implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
20 days ago
But what if the Lean business case is already completed, shouldn't we move forward?
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
27 days ago
I think we should prioritize based on WSJF ranking to ensure maximum value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
28 days ago
I agree, it's important to wait for the Agile Release Trains to have capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. If the Epic has the highest WSJF ranking, it should be implemented regardless of the other steps.
upvoted 0 times
Ma
18 days ago
User 2: Agreed, it's all about prioritizing based on value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
28 days ago
User 1: I think Option D makes sense. Highest WSJF ranking should take priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Billi
2 months ago
But what if it has the highest WSJF ranking? Shouldn't it be implemented then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
2 months ago
Option B seems the most logical next step. Moving the Epic to the Portfolio Backlog once it receives a 'go' decision from Lean Portfolio Management makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Willis
7 days ago
That way, we can ensure we are implementing the most valuable Epics first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
20 days ago
Once it's in the Portfolio Backlog, we can prioritize it based on WSJF ranking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
25 days ago
It's important to wait for the 'go' decision from Lean Portfolio Management before moving the Epic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
29 days ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most logical next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassi
2 months ago
I agree with Curtis, it makes sense to wait for approval before moving forward with implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
2 months ago
I think the next step for the Epic is to be implemented once the Lean business case is approved by the Epic Owner.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel