MENU
When using SAS Data Integration Studio's SQL Join transformation, which SQL join type can be constructed as either an implicit or an explicit join?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium A00-260 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
HU
Hubert
12 months ago
Yeah, Inner join is the way to go here!
BA
Barb
12 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? Sounds off.
TH
Theron
1 year ago
Inner join can be both implicit and explicit, right?
LA
Lavera
1 year ago
I thought it was Full join, but I guess not.
GA
Gayla
1 year ago
It's definitely the Inner join!
CH
Chi
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards Union, but I can't recall if it’s considered an implicit join. This is confusing!
CA
Cary
1 year ago
I feel like we did a similar question on Cross joins last week, but I don't think that's the right answer here.
BA
Bambi
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Full joins being a bit tricky. Could they also be implicit?
OL
Oliva
1 year ago
I think the answer might be Inner join since we discussed how it can be written in both ways during our practice sessions.
CA
Catarina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with Arista's file extensions. I'll have to think this one through carefully.
NI
Nidia
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the Oracle Solaris Image Packaging System. I'll read through the options carefully and try to recall what I know about IPS.
NE
Nettie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know there are a few different networking concepts that involve packets, but I can't quite remember the specific term for encapsulating one packet inside another. I'll have to think this through carefully.
AI
Aimee
1 year ago
Ah, I see now - the key is whether the taxpayers were legally separated, not just living apart. I've got this.