Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAS A00-240 Exam - Topic 7 Question 121 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAS's A00-240 exam
Question #: 121
Topic #: 7
[All A00-240 Questions]

Refer to the REG procedure output:

An analyst has selected this model as a champion because it shows better model fit than a competing model with more predictors.

Which statistic justifies this rationale?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Sabra at Jan 22, 2026, 02:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium A00-240 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jeannine
1 day ago
Totally agree, simpler models can be better!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
7 days ago
The AIC value is lower for the champion model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
12 days ago
The F-statistic, obviously. Can't beat that good old-fashioned significance test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
17 days ago
I'm just here for the jokes. This exam is making me sleepy already!
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
22 days ago
Nah, the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) is the way to go. Gotta love those information criteria!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
27 days ago
Hmm, I'd go with the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) on this one. Lower is better, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
1 month ago
The R-squared value looks pretty good, that's gotta be the one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 month ago
I recall that the likelihood ratio test might be useful for comparing models, but I’m not confident if that’s the right approach for this specific question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 month ago
I practiced a question like this where we had to choose between models based on their fit statistics. I feel like the F-statistic could also play a role in justifying the champion model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about AIC or BIC being used to compare model fit. Could that be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
2 months ago
I think the statistic we're looking for might be the adjusted R-squared, since it accounts for the number of predictors in the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
3 months ago
The R-squared is high, but I'm not sure if that's the best way to compare these two models. I'll need to look at the other fit statistics, like the F-test and the significance of the individual predictors, to really justify why this model is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
3 months ago
The R-squared is definitely the standout statistic here. If the competing model has more predictors but a lower R-squared, that's a pretty clear indication that this model is the better fit. I'll focus on explaining that in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
3 months ago
Okay, the R-squared is high, so that seems like a good sign. But I'm a little confused about how to interpret the other statistics in the output. I'll need to refresh my memory on which ones are most relevant for model selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
3 months ago
The R-squared is definitely high, but I'm wondering if there are other important factors to consider, like the significance of the predictors or the overall model F-test. I'll need to dig into the details to really understand which statistic is the best justification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
3 months ago
Hmm, the R-squared value looks promising, but I'm not sure if that's the best statistic to focus on here. I'll need to review the other model fit statistics to make a more informed decision.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel