Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAS A00-240 Exam - Topic 2 Question 54 Discussion

A researcher has several variables that could be possible predictors for the final model. There is interest in checking all 2-way interactions for possible entry to the model. The researcher has decided to use forward selection within PROC LOGISTIC. Fill in the missing code option that will ensure that all 2-way interactions will be considered for entry.
C) include = 5
A) start = 5
B) include = 4
D) start = 4

SAS A00-240 Exam - Topic 2 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAS's A00-240 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 2
[All A00-240 Questions]

A researcher has several variables that could be possible predictors for the final model. There is interest in checking all 2-way interactions for possible entry to the model. The researcher has decided to use forward selection within PROC LOGISTIC. Fill in the missing code option that will ensure that all 2-way interactions will be considered for entry.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Myra at Jun 28, 2022, 05:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium A00-240 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rebbecca
7 months ago
C is correct, but I’m surprised it’s not more common knowledge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
7 months ago
I read that forward selection usually needs a higher start value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? What if D is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
8 months ago
Definitely agree with C, it makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
8 months ago
I think option C is the right choice for including all interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
8 months ago
I vaguely recall that using "start" or "include" changes how the model builds, but I can't remember which one is correct for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether "include = 4" or "include = 5" is more appropriate for ensuring all 2-way interactions are considered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
8 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to specify the number of predictors for interactions. I feel like "start = 4" could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
8 months ago
I think we need to set the right number of variables to include all interactions, but I'm not sure if it's "include = 5" or "include = 4."
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
8 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The options don't seem to directly match what the question is asking for. I'll need to review the Marketo reporting capabilities more closely to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. What's the difference between the assignment options? I'll need to review those carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
9 months ago
Iptables is the way to go here. It's the standard firewall for Linux and has a ton of features and flexibility. Should be a safe bet for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel