A and D, all the way! Selecting activity prices from other versions and the combined run, that's the real deal. Though I'm not sure about the 'reduced number of steps' - maybe they just made the cockpit more confusing.
I'm going with A and D. Selecting activity prices from other CO-versions and the combined run for standard and alternative valuations just make sense for actual costing.
Haha, reduced number of steps in the calculation cockpit? That's like saying I can get my taxes done faster by setting the house on fire. I'll go with B and D.
B and D seem like the correct answers. The simplified data structure and combined run for both standard and alternative valuations are definitely features of actual costing in S/4HANA.
Cheryl
1 years agoVenita
1 years agoVeronika
1 years agoMira
1 years agoGeraldo
1 years agoKiera
12 months agoStevie
1 years agoEdelmira
1 years agoEdelmira
1 years agoRodolfo
1 years agoRodolfo
1 years agoAdelaide
1 years agoTracie
1 years agoCharlie
1 years agoAntonio
1 years agoElfrieda
1 years agoBrande
1 years agoJanna
1 years agoMarge
1 years agoReed
1 years agoMaurine
1 years agoMalcolm
1 years agoGerri
1 years agoJanessa
1 years agoAlyce
1 years agoArlene
1 years agoCasey
1 years agoFreida
1 years agoElfrieda
1 years ago