Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam P_S4FIN_2021 Topic 2 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_S4FIN_2021 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 2
[All P_S4FIN_2021 Questions]

On which levels can you assign semantic tags to a financial statement version in SAP Fiori?Note: There are 3 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Glenna at Sep 07, 2024, 05:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium P_S4FIN_2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Yuonne
10 months ago
That's a good point, maybe B is the better option after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
10 months ago
I'm voting for option C. Gotta keep those ledgers nice and tidy, you know? Hey, at least we're not talking about derivatives - those things are scarier than a currency exchange on a bad day!
upvoted 0 times
Dana
9 months ago
Derivatives can definitely be tricky, but at least we have a handle on foreign currency valuation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
9 months ago
Yeah, having separate valuation areas and accounting principles for each GAAP makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
10 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best way to keep everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosita
10 months ago
I think B makes more sense, it's simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
11 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Just make sure you don't mix up your valuation areas - that would be a real currency crisis!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
11 months ago
But wouldn't defining two valuation areas and two accounting principles be too complex?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
I'm not an accountant, but option C sounds like it would give you the most flexibility to manage the different GAAP requirements. Plus, who doesn't love a good 'ol valuation area?
upvoted 0 times
Levi
10 months ago
B) Define a valuation area and an accounting principle with relevant links to ledgers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
10 months ago
That's a good point, having two valuation areas does seem like it would offer more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
10 months ago
C) Define two valuation areas and two accounting principles with relevant links to ledgers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
10 months ago
A) Define two valuation methods and assign the accounting principles to the new valuation methods
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacki
11 months ago
Option A sounds a bit too simple. I'm leaning towards C as well - it seems to cover all the bases for handling the different valuation requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Coleen
10 months ago
Definitely, it's important to have separate setups for local and international GAAP to ensure accurate valuation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
10 months ago
I agree, having two valuation areas and two accounting principles seems like the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
10 months ago
I think C is the best option here. It covers all the bases for handling different valuation requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuonne
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
11 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
11 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Defining two valuation areas and two accounting principles with relevant links to ledgers seems like the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
Reed
11 months ago
I think option B could also work, by defining a valuation area and an accounting principle with relevant links to ledgers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
11 months ago
I agree, option C does seem like the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel