I think the key here is to keep the existing method intact while still accommodating the new parameter. Overloading the method seems like the best way to do that.
Adding a new property to the beans.xml file doesn't seem like the right solution here. That's more for configuring the service, not modifying its behavior.
Hmm, I'm leaning towards extending the default implementation to handle the new parameter. That seems like the most straightforward way to add the new functionality without disrupting the existing code.
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should we be modifying the existing method or creating a new one? I'm not sure if extending the strategy or implementation is the right way to go.
I think the best approach here is to overload the existing method by adding the new parameter. That way we can keep the existing functionality intact while also handling the new requirement.
Nieves
1 month agoEna
1 month agoNikita
2 months agoErnest
2 months agoJuliana
2 months agoBobbye
2 months agoQuiana
2 months agoRikki
3 months agoChaya
3 months agoFarrah
3 months agoKimberlie
3 months agoHobert
3 months ago