Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam P_BTPA_2408 Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_BTPA_2408 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 1
[All P_BTPA_2408 Questions]

As a solution architect, you are in a meeting about the design of a new application to manage the delivery process of goods or services. The extension will be maintained by the line of business (as opposed to IT).

The following application parameters/features are discussed:

* Tracking deliveries in real-time

* Optimizing delivery routes

* Providing delivery notifications to customers.

* Scaling according to usage

* Maintenance downtime must be short.

Which extension type is best suited for this application?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tasia
3 months ago
I'm just hoping none of the options involve a hamster wheel powering the whole system. That might be 'scaling according to usage,' but I don't think it would hold up too well.
upvoted 0 times
Milly
1 months ago
I agree, a hamster wheel might not be the best solution for scaling!
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
2 months ago
C) Key user
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
2 months ago
B) Classic
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
2 months ago
A) Side-by-side
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oren
3 months ago
Side-by-side all the way! If I had a delivery truck, I'd name it 'Side-by-Side Sally' and paint it bright pink. That'd really optimize the routes, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
3 months ago
The Side-by-side extension seems like the way to go. It's designed for scenarios just like this, where the business needs to take the lead on maintenance and updates. I can't imagine the Classic approach being nimble enough.
upvoted 0 times
Jeanice
2 months ago
I see your point, but I think the Key user extension might not provide the flexibility needed for this application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
2 months ago
C) Key user
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
2 months ago
I agree, the Side-by-side extension allows the business to maintain control and make updates without disrupting the main system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
2 months ago
A) Side-by-side
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
3 months ago
I'm not sure the Key user extension would be the best fit here. Maintaining downtime is crucial, and Key user extensions can be more complex to manage and update. I'd lean towards the Side-by-side option.
upvoted 0 times
Aretha
2 months ago
Classic extensions may not be as flexible for scaling according to usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
2 months ago
Side-by-side extensions also allow for minimal downtime during maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
2 months ago
I agree, Side-by-side extensions are easier to manage and update.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bobbye
4 months ago
Based on the requirements for real-time tracking, optimizing delivery routes, and scaling, I think the best option is the Side-by-side extension type. This allows for more flexibility and customization compared to the Classic approach.
upvoted 0 times
Malika
2 months ago
I think the Key user extension type might not provide enough flexibility for the real-time tracking and scaling requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
2 months ago
C) Key user
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 months ago
I agree, the Side-by-side extension type would be the most suitable for this application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
3 months ago
A) Side-by-side
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keneth
4 months ago
I disagree. I think Key user would be better as it allows for customization by the line of business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
4 months ago
I agree with Nikita. Side-by-side allows for new features to be added without affecting the existing system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
4 months ago
I think the best extension type for this application is Side-by-side.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel