New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP E_BW4HANA214 Exam - Topic 5 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's E_BW4HANA214 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 5
[All E_BW4HANA214 Questions]

A customer wants to convert from SAP BW powered by SAP HANA to SAP BW/4HANA Which strategy does SAP recommend based on successor object types? Note: There are 3 correct answers to this question

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D, E

by Brande at Jun 11, 2025, 03:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium E_BW4HANA214 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jennifer
2 months ago
Wait, are we really using Open ODS Views now? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
2 months ago
I think B is also important for managing data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
3 months ago
Definitely A, C, and D are the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
3 months ago
I disagree with B, it seems unnecessary for most cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
3 months ago
Composite Providers are a game changer, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about Semantic Groups; I thought they were more for organizing data rather than a direct conversion strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we discussed Write Interface-Enabled Data Store objects, so I feel confident about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
4 months ago
I remember something about using ODP SAP source systems, but I can't recall if that's definitely one of the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
4 months ago
I think the answer might include using Composite Providers instead of Info Sets, but I'm not completely sure about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
4 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. The key is recognizing that SAP has specific recommendations for the migration strategy, so I'll need to pay close attention to their guidance on successor object types. I think I can narrow it down to the 3 correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
4 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the differences between some of these object types, like Composite Providers and Info Sets. I'll need to review the documentation carefully to make sure I understand the nuances before selecting the answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
4 months ago
I've worked on a few SAP BW to BW/4HANA migrations before, so I think I've got a good handle on this. The options around Write Interface-Enabled Data Store objects, Semantic Groups, and ODP SAP source systems sound like the right approaches to focus on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key seems to be identifying the 3 correct answers from the options provided. I'll need to think through each one and how it relates to the migration from SAP BW to SAP BW/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the successor object types and SAP's recommended strategies to make sure I understand the differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
7 months ago
C, huh? ODP SAP source system type instead of a DB-connect? That's a bold move, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off.
upvoted 0 times
Dana
5 months ago
Yeah, using ODP SAP as a source system can definitely streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
7 months ago
I think C is a good choice. It can improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delisa
7 months ago
Wait, there are 3 correct answers? I was gonna go with just B and E. Guess I better review the material again. *sigh*
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
8 months ago
D? Composite Providers over Info Sets? SAP must be really pushing that these days. Sounds like a good strategy to me.
upvoted 0 times
Ora
7 months ago
I agree, SAP is definitely emphasizing the use of Composite Providers for better data modeling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
7 months ago
Yes, D is one of the correct answers. Composite Providers offer better performance and flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelina
8 months ago
I believe using Open ODS Views for virtual access to master and transactional data is also a good strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
8 months ago
I agree with Sunshine, it makes sense to use Semantic Groups for better organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
8 months ago
I think SAP recommends using Semantic Groups to organize big data volumes in Data Store objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
8 months ago
A, B, and E for sure. Gotta love those Write Interface-Enabled Data Store objects and Semantic Groups! Virtual access is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Francene
7 months ago
E) Use Open ODS Views to establish virtual access for master and transactional data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
7 months ago
B) Use Semantic Groups to organize big data volumes in Data Store objects (advanced).
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
8 months ago
A) Use Write Interface-Enabled Data Store objects (advanced) instead of Virtual Providers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel