Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP E_BW4HANA214 Exam - Topic 4 Question 7 Discussion

What are valid reason to generate external SAP HANA View for SAP BW/4HANA objects? Note: there are 2 correct answers to this question.
A) To consume SAP BW/4HANA data and manage access with native SAP HANA concepts and B) To leverage the SAP HANA-optimezed Analytic Manager to process BW Query
C) To create an additional persistent layer of data in SAP HANA
D) To apply SAP HANA transformational logic instead of SAO ABAP logic

SAP E_BW4HANA214 Exam - Topic 4 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's E_BW4HANA214 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 4
[All E_BW4HANA214 Questions]

What are valid reason to generate external SAP HANA View for SAP BW/4HANA objects? Note: there are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Terrilyn at Feb 09, 2024, 09:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium E_BW4HANA214 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Estrella
10 months ago
I’m surprised that people would choose C, seems redundant.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
10 months ago
Totally agree with A and D, they’re spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
10 months ago
Wait, creating a persistent layer? That sounds unnecessary!
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
11 months ago
I think B makes sense too, but not sure about C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
11 months ago
A is definitely a valid reason!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
11 months ago
I recall discussing option D in relation to using HANA logic over ABAP, so I think that one could be valid too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
11 months ago
I feel like option C is incorrect since creating a persistent layer seems unnecessary for external views.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about option B; I remember something about the Analytic Manager, but it feels a bit vague to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
12 months ago
I think option A makes sense because it talks about managing access with HANA concepts, which we covered in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
12 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at here. The key is to focus on the benefits of using SAP HANA views for BW/4HANA data, like the ability to leverage native HANA concepts and the Analytic Manager. I think I've got this one figured out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure I fully understand the differences between the options. Maybe I should review my notes on SAP HANA views and how they relate to BW/4HANA before attempting to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
12 months ago
I've worked with SAP HANA and BW/4HANA before, so I think I have a good handle on this. The first two options seem like the correct answers to me. The other options don't really make sense in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
12 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know that SAP HANA views can be used to access BW/4HANA data, so that's definitely one valid reason. But I'm not sure about the other options - I'll need to think about them a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
12 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think I'll start by carefully reading through the options and trying to understand the key differences between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
12 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The insert options seem to be related to controlling what Content Authors can add under a specific item, but I'm not entirely sure of the nuances. I'll need to review my notes to see if I can figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
12 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm torn between the SysTest Framework and the Performance software development kit (Perf SDK). I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each approach to determine the best recommendation for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
12 months ago
I remember reading that random walks can be inefficient, so I think it might not be the best choice for repeatability and effort. I'd go with launching multiple jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. I'll need to make sure I understand the key differences between them before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
12 months ago
Enabling WMM TSPEC/TCLAS negotiation sounds familiar, but I feel like it might not be the main solution for an iOS-heavy environment right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
2 years ago
Yes, making use of HANA transformational logic can be more efficient
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
2 years ago
Haha, C is just asking for trouble. Might as well just store everything in Excel and call it a day. A and D are the real winners here.
upvoted 0 times
Verlene
2 years ago
Yeah, A and D make more sense for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 years ago
Definitely, A and D are the safer options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
2 years ago
I agree, C does seem risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hermila
2 years ago
I also think option D) is valid as it allows for using HANA logic instead of ABAP logic
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
2 years ago
B seems like a bit of a stretch. I mean, who wants to process BW Queries in HANA when you can just use the BW Analytic Engine? A and D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
2 years ago
True, but A and D are definitely more valid reasons for generating external SAP HANA Views.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
2 years ago
But B could still be useful for leveraging the SAP HANA-optimized Analytic Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
2 years ago
I agree, A and D make more sense for generating external SAP HANA Views.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominga
2 years ago
I agree, having access to BW data in HANA natively is important
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
2 years ago
I agree with A and D. Leveraging HANA's native capabilities like the Analytic Manager and transformation logic makes a lot of sense for BW/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
Leanora
2 years ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 years ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
2 years ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 years ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephen
2 years ago
I think option A) makes sense because it allows us to consume BW data in HANA
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
2 years ago
That could be a valid reason as well, to optimize BW queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
2 years ago
But what about option B? Isn't using Analytic Manager a valid reason too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
2 years ago
A and D are definitely the right answers. Why would you need to create an additional persistent layer of data in HANA? That just seems like extra work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
2 years ago
I agree with you. Leveraging SAP HANA concepts and logic makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
2 years ago
I think A and D are valid reasons for generating external SAP HANA Views.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel