Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_TS4FI_2021 Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS4FI_2021 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 5
[All C_TS4FI_2021 Questions]

You 'd like to set up low values asset (LVA) management.

What do you need to do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Cristen at Dec 10, 2024, 04:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TS4FI_2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shannon
3 months ago
I'm gonna go with B. Seems like the most comprehensive approach to managing those pesky LVAs. Now, where's the cafeteria? I'm starving!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
3 months ago
B for sure! Gotta cover all the bases when it comes to those low-value assets, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Becky
2 months ago
Agreed! It's important to have a clear structure in place for managing low-value assets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
2 months ago
Definitely! Specifying the minimum amount for LVA at three levels is crucial for proper management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
2 months ago
B for sure! Gotta cover all the bases when it comes to those low-value assets, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denae
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. I'll have to really think this through. Maybe I'll just go with my gut and choose B.
upvoted 0 times
Miriam
2 months ago
User 3: I agree, it provides more detailed control over the LVA management process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, specifying the minimum amount at three levels seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
3 months ago
User 1: I think B is the way to go for setting up LVA management.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mirta
4 months ago
D seems like the easiest option, but I'm not sure if that's specific enough for LVA management. I'll go with B to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
2 months ago
User 4: Yeah, I think specifying the minimum amount at three levels is important for accurate management of LVAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
3 months ago
User 3: B sounds like a good choice to ensure specific requirements for LVA management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
3 months ago
User 2: I agree, but I'm going with B just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
3 months ago
User 1: I think D is the easiest option for setting up LVA management.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Otis
4 months ago
But specifying the minimum amount at three levels seems like a good idea too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
4 months ago
I agree with Lanie, it would help in managing LVA more efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
4 months ago
I think we should define two separate asset classes for LVA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. Specifying the minimum amount for LVA at three levels makes the most sense to properly manage these assets.
upvoted 0 times
Eura
3 months ago
That could work too, but I think having the minimum amount specified at three levels provides more clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
3 months ago
I would go with option A, defining two separate asset classes seems like a good approach for LVA management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
3 months ago
I agree, it's important to have that level of detail in place for effective management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. Specifying the minimum amount for LVA at three levels makes the most sense to properly manage these assets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel