Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_TS462_2023 Topic 2 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS462_2023 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 2
[All C_TS462_2023 Questions]

In your pricing procedure you have several condition types for a price such as PROO, PR02, PN00 and HM00. Only one of these prices is taken into account

Which setting causes this behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Jettie at Jan 09, 2025, 03:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TS462_2023 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Evangelina
3 months ago
I'm gonna go with 'B) Exclusion indicator' and hope for the best. This pricing stuff is like a maze, but at least it keeps us on our toes, right?
upvoted 0 times
Jolanda
2 months ago
I'll stick with 'C) Condition class' and see how it goes. Good luck to all of us!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I'll go with 'A) Condition function' just to mix it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
I think it might be 'B) Exclusion indicator' too. Let's see if that's the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
4 months ago
Wait, wait, wait... is the correct answer 'D) Header condition'? I thought that was only for header-level pricing, not individual condition types. Oh, the joys of SAP pricing!
upvoted 0 times
Dorian
2 months ago
User 3: I think it's D) Header condition because it applies to the overall pricing of the document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
2 months ago
User 2: Really? I always thought it was C) Condition class that determined which price is used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
3 months ago
User 1: It's actually B) Exclusion indicator that causes only one price to be taken into account.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janet
4 months ago
The Exclusion indicator, of course! Sounds like a classic case of mutually exclusive conditions. I should have known that from the start.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
3 months ago
User 3: I should have known that from the start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
3 months ago
User 2: Sounds like a classic case of mutually exclusive conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
3 months ago
User 1: The Exclusion indicator, of course!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to go with Condition class on this one. Seems like the logical choice to control which price takes precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's the header condition that controls which price is considered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
4 months ago
Ah, the classic 'only one price counts' scenario. I bet it's the Exclusion indicator, gotta love those tricky condition settings!
upvoted 0 times
Arlean
3 months ago
Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. It's always tricky to figure out these condition settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
3 months ago
I think it's the Exclusion indicator.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denise
4 months ago
I believe it's the condition class that determines which price is taken into account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I think the setting that causes this behavior is the exclusion indicator.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel