Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_TS462_2023 Topic 2 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS462_2023 exam

Question #: 20
Topic #: 2

[All C_TS462_2023 Questions]

In your pricing procedure you have several condition types for a price such as PROO, PR02, PN00 and HM00. Only one of these prices is taken into account

Which setting causes this behavior?

ACondition function

BExclusion indicator

CCondition class

DHeader condition

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

by Jettie at Jan 09, 2025, 03:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TS462_2023 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Evangelina

1 months ago

I'm gonna go with 'B) Exclusion indicator' and hope for the best. This pricing stuff is like a maze, but at least it keeps us on our toes, right?

upvoted 0 times

Cherelle

7 days ago

I think it might be 'B) Exclusion indicator' too. Let's see if that's the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Paris

2 months ago

Wait, wait, wait... is the correct answer 'D) Header condition'? I thought that was only for header-level pricing, not individual condition types. Oh, the joys of SAP pricing!

upvoted 0 times

Dorian

9 days ago

User 3: I think it's D) Header condition because it applies to the overall pricing of the document.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestina

20 days ago

User 2: Really? I always thought it was C) Condition class that determined which price is used.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billy

1 months ago

User 1: It's actually B) Exclusion indicator that causes only one price to be taken into account.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Janet

2 months ago

The Exclusion indicator, of course! Sounds like a classic case of mutually exclusive conditions. I should have known that from the start.

upvoted 0 times

Antonio

27 days ago

User 3: I should have known that from the start.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

1 months ago

User 2: Sounds like a classic case of mutually exclusive conditions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edna

2 months ago

User 1: The Exclusion indicator, of course!

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Micaela

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm going to go with Condition class on this one. Seems like the logical choice to control which price takes precedence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

2 months ago

I'm pretty sure it's the header condition that controls which price is considered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

2 months ago

Ah, the classic 'only one price counts' scenario. I bet it's the Exclusion indicator, gotta love those tricky condition settings!

upvoted 0 times

Arlean

1 months ago

Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. It's always tricky to figure out these condition settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

1 months ago

I think it's the Exclusion indicator.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Denise

2 months ago

I believe it's the condition class that determines which price is taken into account.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

2 months ago

I think the setting that causes this behavior is the exclusion indicator.

upvoted 0 times

...