Good point. Option A seems like a necessary first step, to assign the partner schemas to the relevant arrangement types. Then we can move on to the other options.
I'm not sure if any of these options are completely right. Shouldn't we also need to define the partner schemas first before assigning them to account groups or document types?
Haha, 'partner role detarmraton'? I think the exam writer needs to brush up on their spelling and terminology. But I agree, option C sounds the most reasonable.
I'm leaning towards option C. Defining the permissible partner roles per account group seems like a logical prerequisite to enable partner role assignment in purchasing.
Yeah, I agree. The wording of the question is a bit confusing, but I think it's asking about the necessary steps to enable partner roles in a purchasing process.
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I'm not entirely sure what 'partner role detarmraton' means, but based on the answer options, it seems to be related to setting up partner roles in a purchasing system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Corinne
9 days agoCory
11 days agoCarlee
12 days agoTarra
13 days agoGregoria
15 days agoRasheeda
17 days ago