SAP Exam C_TS422_2022 Topic 9 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS422_2022 exam

Question #: 37
Topic #: 9

[All C_TS422_2022 Questions]

You want to trigger in-house production of a semi-finished material before a sales order for the corresponding finished good is received. Which planning strategy supports the consumption of planned independent requirements for the semi-finished material?

APlanning with final assembly (40)

BProduction by lot size (30)

CPlanning at assembly level (70)

DMake-to-order production (20)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Portia at Apr 30, 2025, 08:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TS422_2022 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Peggie

29 days ago

That's true, Emelda. Make-to-order production (D) might not be the most efficient choice in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emelda

30 days ago

I see your point, Gilma. Planning at assembly level (C) could also be a good option to consider for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

30 days ago

I don't know, guys, but I'm getting a strong feeling that option C is the way to go. Planning at the assembly level just sounds like it's going to get the job done.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 months ago

Planning with final assembly (option A) seems like the way to go. I mean, who doesn't love a good assembly line, am I right? Let's keep this train rolling!

upvoted 0 times

Kati

5 days ago

Planning at assembly level might be a good option to consider as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

10 days ago

I think production by lot size could also work well in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

14 days ago

I agree, planning with final assembly is efficient and keeps things moving smoothly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilma

1 months ago

I disagree, I believe production by lot size (B) would be a better strategy for triggering in-house production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggie

1 months ago

I think planning with final assembly (A) would support the consumption of planned independent requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristel

2 months ago

Haha, make-to-order production (option D)? What is this, the dark ages? Let's leave that one in the past, shall we?

upvoted 0 times

Kristeen

3 days ago

Haha, make-to-order production (option D)? What is this, the dark ages? Let's leave that one in the past, shall we?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ayesha

7 days ago

C) Planning at assembly level (70)

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnathon

10 days ago

B) Production by lot size (30)

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

16 days ago

A) Planning with final assembly (40)

upvoted 0 times

...

Andrew

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't production by lot size (option B) make more sense? That way you can get ahead of the curve and have the semi-finished material ready to go.

upvoted 0 times

Rosamond

27 days ago

User 3: Production by lot size (option B) could be a good way to stay ahead of demand.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronika

2 months ago

User 2: Planning with final assembly (option A) might also work well in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geraldine

2 months ago

User 1: I think planning at assembly level (option C) would be the best strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wynell

2 months ago

I think option C is the way to go. Planning at the assembly level sounds like the perfect strategy for triggering in-house production before the sales order.

upvoted 0 times

Nathan

1 months ago

Production by lot size might be a good option to consider as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

2 months ago

I think planning with final assembly could also work well for this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kassandra

2 months ago

I agree, planning at the assembly level seems like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...