Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_TS422_2021 Topic 4 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS422_2021 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 4
[All C_TS422_2021 Questions]

You need to model goods receipt processing time in detailed scheduling. Whic modeling options do you have?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Berry at Jul 17, 2024, 09:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TS422_2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Josphine
3 months ago
I'm just glad I don't have to figure out the best way to model goods receipt processing. Sounds like a real headache, but Option D seems like the winner to me.
upvoted 0 times
Claudio
2 months ago
I'm glad we're on the same page about this. It can be a complex process to model goods receipt processing time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 months ago
It definitely sounds like the most comprehensive option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
2 months ago
I agree, modeling a handling resource in the location master and goods receipt time in the material master seems like the most detailed approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
2 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rasheeda
3 months ago
Option B is a bit too siloed in my opinion. Separating the resource from the location master could make the model more complex than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Hildegarde
2 months ago
That's a good point. Option D does seem like a more streamlined approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
2 months ago
I think option D might be a better choice. It combines handling resource and goods receipt time in the location and material masters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 months ago
I agree, option B does seem a bit siloed. It could make things more complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivory
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who came up with these options has some serious scheduling nightmares to deal with. Option D sounds like the way to go, though.
upvoted 0 times
Penney
2 months ago
Yeah, it definitely seems like the most comprehensive option for modeling goods receipt processing time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
2 months ago
I think modeling a handling resource in the location master and goods receipt time in the material master is the best way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
3 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the most detailed approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
4 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option A could also work if we focus on transportation resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
4 months ago
I think Option C is a good choice as well. Modeling the resource inbound in the location master could provide a more centralized way to manage the goods receipt process.
upvoted 0 times
Rasheeda
3 months ago
I think Option D could also work well by modeling handling resource in the location master.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
3 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like a centralized approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thomasena
4 months ago
Option D seems the most comprehensive approach to model the goods receipt processing time. It covers both the resource in the location master and the time in the material master.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
4 months ago
I agree with Lettie, option D seems like the most comprehensive choice for modeling goods receipt processing time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
4 months ago
I think option D makes sense because it includes both handling resource and goods receipt time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel