SAP C_TS422_2021 Exam - Topic 4 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS422_2021 exam

Question #: 21
Topic #: 4

[All C_TS422_2021 Questions]

You want to triggering-house production of a semi-finished mater al before a sales order for the corresponding finished good is received. Which planning strategy supports the consumption of planned independent requirements for the semi-finished material?

AMake-to-order production (20)

BPlanning at assembly level (70)

CPlanning with final assembly (40)

DPlanning without final assembly (50)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

by Merissa at Jul 06, 2023, 05:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TS422_2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kenneth

5 months ago

C is definitely not the right choice, just saying!

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassi

5 months ago

I'm surprised this is even a question, thought it was more straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

5 months ago

Wait, isn't A also a valid option?

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreen

6 months ago

Totally agree, B makes the most sense here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarah

6 months ago

I think it's B, planning at assembly level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherri

6 months ago

I thought planning with final assembly was more about waiting for sales orders, so maybe it's not the correct answer for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenna

6 months ago

I feel like planning at assembly level might be the right choice, but I can't recall the specifics of how it works with semi-finished materials.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

6 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question where we discussed make-to-order versus make-to-stock. I wonder if that applies here too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

6 months ago

I think this question is about production strategies, but I'm not entirely sure which one supports independent requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katina

7 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on the information provided, I believe the Network Virtual Appliance (NVA) option would be the best way to connect the Azure Virtual WAN to the 3rd party SD-WAN solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Queen

7 months ago

A SIPOC map could work, but I think a Cross-Functional Flowchart would be the most appropriate here. It will give the best visual representation of how the different teams interact with the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernell

7 months ago

NTFS is definitely the way to go for Windows. It has better security and supports larger file sizes than the older FAT systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

7 months ago

The key here is to leverage the existing hardware resources. Adding another 10G port and using LACP is the most efficient way to boost the bandwidth on the Citrix ADC.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashunda

11 months ago

I've got a better strategy: Just order the finished product and skip the whole semi-finished material nonsense. That way, you can sit back and let someone else worry about the planning!

upvoted 0 times

Marget

10 months ago

C) Planning with final assembly (40)

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecil

10 months ago

B) Planning at assembly level (70)

upvoted 0 times

...

Merlyn

11 months ago

A) Make-to-order production (20)

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederic

12 months ago

Ah, this is a tough one. I'll have to go with my gut and choose A) Make-to-order production. At least that way, I won't have to worry about planning for a semi-finished material!

upvoted 0 times

Loren

10 months ago

User 3: I agree with Loren, Planning with final assembly (C) sounds like a solid strategy to support consumption of planned independent requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eliseo

10 months ago

User 2: Planning with final assembly (C) might be a good choice too. It could help streamline the production process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

11 months ago

User 1: I think I'll go with B) Planning at assembly level. It seems like the best option for consuming planned independent requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaunna

12 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I'm going to go with C) Planning with final assembly. That seems like the most logical choice, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Annelle

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think planning without final assembly (50) could also work because it focuses on the semi-finished material rather than the final assembly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. The question is a bit confusing, but I'll go with D) Planning without final assembly. Seems like the best fit to me.

upvoted 0 times

Curtis

12 months ago

User 2: I agree, it seems like the most suitable option for triggering-house production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyssa

12 months ago

User 1: I think D) Planning without final assembly is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kendra

1 year ago

I agree with Carman. Planning at assembly level (70) makes sense because it allows for production to start before the sales order is received.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carman

1 year ago

I think planning at assembly level (70) would support the consumption of planned independent requirements for the semi-finished material.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsay

1 year ago

I'm not sure about planning at assembly level (B). I think planning without final assembly (D) could also work, as it focuses on the semi-finished material itself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

1 year ago

I agree with Thad. Planning at assembly level (B) makes sense because it allows for production to be triggered before the sales order is received.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

1 year ago

I think B) Planning at assembly level is the correct answer, since the question mentions triggering production of a semi-finished material before the final sales order is received, which aligns with the description of that option.

upvoted 0 times