New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP C_THR86_2505 Exam - Topic 8 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2505 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 8
[All C_THR86_2505 Questions]

Your client wants to restrict entry into the Lump Sum field to only members of the reward team. How can you achieve this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tresa at Nov 21, 2025, 03:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2505 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Melissa
1 month ago
D) is a bit too restrictive, we don't want to completely disable the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
1 month ago
C) seems like the best option to restrict access to the Lump Sum field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to limit access to a field, and I think using permissions is usually the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about using mass actions. Could that be option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
I'm pretty confident I'd go with option C. Restricting access at the field level seems like the cleanest way to implement this requirement. The other options just feel like they'd create more problems than they solve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
2 months ago
I think option C sounds right since it mentions field-based permissions, which we covered in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
2 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I'm leaning towards option C as well. That way we can specifically grant access to the reward team without impacting the rest of the planners. The read-only option D seems a bit heavy-handed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
3 months ago
C is the best option for restricting access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
3 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if the client has a secret lump sum stash they're trying to hide from the planners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
3 months ago
I feel like setting the field to read-only, like in option D, might be too restrictive for the planners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if updating the guidelines to set all the values to 0 is the right approach. Wouldn't that just prevent anyone from using the field, not just non-reward team members?
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
3 months ago
I think I'd start by looking at option C - using field-based permissions on the Lump Sum field. That seems like the most targeted approach to restrict access to just the reward team.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel