SAP C_THR81_2505 Exam - Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR81_2505 exam

Question #: 11
Topic #: 2

You have updated several position departments using Import and Export data, but the incumbent's data still shows the previous information for the department hris-field.

What are some possible causes for this data inconsistency? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

AThe technicalParameters value has NOT been set to SYNC in the position records.

BThe technicalParameters column with a value of SYNC has NOT been included in the import file.

CThe business rule to sync data changes sets the Position Department to be equal to Job Information.Department.

DThe business rule to sync data changes sets the Job Information.Department to be equal to Job Information.Position.Department.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

B . The technicalParameters column with a value of SYNC has NOT been included in the import file:

When importing position data, the technicalParameters column with the value 'SYNC' must be included to ensure that changes to position attributes are synchronized to the incumbent's data.

C . The business rule to sync data changes sets the Position Department to be equal to Job Information.Department:

If the rule is incorrectly configured, the department field on the incumbent's job information may not update as expected. The correct configuration should align the position department with the incumbent's job information.

These factors contribute to discrepancies between position and incumbent data.

by Janella at Nov 24, 2025, 02:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR81_2505 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Micaela

1 month ago

I'm a bit confused about the business rules; I feel like both C and D could be relevant, but I can't recall which one specifically relates to the position department.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francisca

1 month ago

I think option A could be a reason, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the only cause.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marshall

2 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to really read through the question and options carefully to figure out the two correct answers. Focusing on the key details about the technicalParameters and the business rules will be important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

2 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. I'm pretty confident it's either the technicalParameters value not being set to SYNC, or the technicalParameters column not being included in the import file. I'll make sure to carefully review those two possibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tequila

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm thinking it might be one of the business rule issues, like the rule setting the Position Department to be equal to Job Information.Department, or the other way around. I'll need to double-check the details on those.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matt

2 months ago

A) is definitely a possible cause.

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

2 months ago

A and B seem like the most likely culprits here. Gotta love those pesky technical parameters!

upvoted 0 times

...

Queen

3 months ago

C) sounds right, but I'm not sure about D).

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiara

3 months ago

I remember a practice question where we discussed the importance of including all necessary columns in the import file, so option B seems likely too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosamond

3 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. Could it also be that the technicalParameters column with a value of SYNC wasn't included in the import file? I'm not sure about the other options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vannessa

3 months ago

I think the issue could be that the technicalParameters value hasn't been set to SYNC in the position records. That seems like a likely cause.

upvoted 0 times

Dick

3 months ago

I agree, that could definitely be a reason.

upvoted 0 times

...