SAP Exam C_THR81_2405 Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR81_2405 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 4

[All C_THR81_2405 Questions]

What is generic object foTranslation used for in SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central?

ATo translate XML FO field labels

BTo translate any generic object field labels in the instance

CTo translate MDF FO field labels

DTo translate XML and MDF FO field labels

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Na at Sep 17, 2024, 10:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR81_2405 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Horace

10 months ago

Translating field labels? Sounds like a real page-turner of a task. I hope the exam questions get more exciting than this!

upvoted 0 times

Micheline

9 months ago

D) To translate XML FO field labels

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

9 months ago

C) To translate MDF FO field labels

upvoted 0 times

...

Layla

9 months ago

B) To translate any generic object field labels in the instance

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecil

9 months ago

A) To translate XML and MDF FO field labels

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

10 months ago

This one's got me stumped. I'm just going to guess and hope for the best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

10 months ago

I'm feeling lucky with option B! Translating generic object field labels sounds like a nice, broad use case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beata

10 months ago

I don't know, option A seems a bit too narrow. Why would it only translate XML FO field labels and not anything else?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm going to go with C on this one. Translating MDF FO field labels seems like the specific purpose of this tool.

upvoted 0 times

Eulah

9 months ago

C is the way to go. Translating MDF FO field labels is a key function of the tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

9 months ago

I'm not sure, but C sounds right. Translating MDF FO field labels seems like a common task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moira

9 months ago

I agree, C makes the most sense. That's what the generic object foTranslation is for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

10 months ago

I think C is the correct answer. It's all about translating MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Penney

10 months ago

D sounds like the right choice to me. Translating both XML and MDF FO field labels would be a pretty comprehensive use case.

upvoted 0 times

Peter

9 months ago

Yes, D covers a wide range of field labels for translation in SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

9 months ago

D does seem like the most logical choice for translating both XML and MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

10 months ago

I agree, it seems like the most comprehensive option for translating field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

10 months ago

I think D is the correct choice as well. It covers both XML and MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

11 months ago

I believe it's important to be able to translate both XML and MDF FO field labels for a more comprehensive localization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bette

11 months ago

I agree with Krystina. It makes sense to have a tool for translating field labels in the instance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

11 months ago

I think the generic object foTranslation is used to translate any generic object field labels in the instance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

11 months ago

I think option B is the correct answer. Translating any generic object field labels in the instance seems like the most logical use for this tool.

upvoted 0 times

Ben

10 months ago

I'm not sure, but option C could also be correct since it specifically mentions translating MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

10 months ago

I think option A might also be a possibility, as it mentions translating XML and MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardine

10 months ago

I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellen

10 months ago

True, option B does cover a broader range of generic object field labels in the instance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dante

10 months ago

I think option A is more specific to translating XML and MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francene

10 months ago

But what about option A? Could that also be a possible use for the generic object foTranslation?

upvoted 0 times

...

Donette

11 months ago

I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...