Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_THINK1_02 Topic 9 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THINK1_02 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 9
[All C_THINK1_02 Questions]

You are in the synthesis phase and teams should share and synthesize interview results, but some team members are questioning how synthesis exercises are related to the previous exercises. As coach, how do you manage this situation? Note; There is 1 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Brittney at May 10, 2024, 01:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THINK1_02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Kasandra
3 months ago
Ah, the joys of Design Thinking! It's like a game of 'connect the dots' with a blindfold on, but the prize is a groundbreaking solution. Let's not forget the occasional 'synthesis dance' to keep the creative juices flowing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
3 months ago
Option C is interesting, but I'm not sure an iteration of the research phase is necessary here. Seems like the team just needs some guidance on the overall Design Thinking process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
3 months ago
I'd go with Option A. Identifying a common thread can help the team see how the synthesis exercise connects to the previous ones. It's like connecting the dots, but with a creative twist!
upvoted 0 times
Therese
2 months ago
B) That's a great point! It's all about connecting the dots with a creative twist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
2 months ago
A) Identifying a common thread can help the team see how the synthesis exercise connects to the previous ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
2 months ago
B) Explain that Design Thinking is not an a + b = c approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
2 months ago
A) Try to identify a common thread to explain the connections to all other exercises
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shenika
4 months ago
I agree with Hayley. Explaining that Design Thinking is not a straightforward 'a + b = c' approach is crucial for the team to understand the purpose of the synthesis exercise.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
3 months ago
A) Try to identify a common thread to explain the connections to all other exercises
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
3 months ago
C) Explain that in this case an iteration of the research phase is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
3 months ago
B) Explain that Design Thinking is not an a + b = c approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
3 months ago
A) Try to identify a common thread to explain the connections to all other exercises
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hayley
4 months ago
Option B seems to be the most appropriate answer. Design Thinking is an iterative process, not a linear one. Skipping the synthesis exercise would be a mistake.
upvoted 0 times
Hayley
3 months ago
C) Explain that in this case an iteration of the research phase is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
3 months ago
B) Explain that Design Thinking is not an a + b = c approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
3 months ago
A) Try to identify a common thread to explain the connections to all other exercises
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
3 months ago
B) Explain that Design Thinking is not an a + b = c approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
3 months ago
A) Try to identify a common thread to explain the connections to all other exercises
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Freeman
4 months ago
But what if we just skip the synthesis exercise and move on?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
4 months ago
I agree with Evangelina, it will help us see the bigger picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
4 months ago
I think we should try to identify a common thread to explain the connections.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel