Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_TFG51_2211 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TFG51_2211 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All C_TFG51_2211 Questions]

Why would you associate proxy roles to a user role?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Junita at Apr 08, 2024, 05:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TFG51_2211 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Pansy
12 months ago
D all the way! Selecting the roles that can serve as proxies makes the most sense to me. Keeps things flexible and scalable.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
11 months ago
Yes, it definitely makes sense to have that level of scalability in the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
12 months ago
I agree, selecting the roles that can serve as proxies allows for more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karl
1 years ago
Haha, C is just too specific. Who would want to select a single user as a proxy? That's like putting all your eggs in one basket.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
1 years ago
I think B is the way to go. Selecting proxies for multiple user roles seems like a more comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
11 months ago
I prefer B as well, it covers all user roles and ensures a smooth operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
11 months ago
I think A could also work, selecting proxies for a single user can simplify the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
12 months ago
I agree, having proxies for multiple user roles provides more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
12 months ago
B does seem like a more comprehensive solution, covering all user roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
12 months ago
I think A could also work, selecting proxies for a single user can be more specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
1 years ago
I agree, having proxies for multiple user roles provides more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephania
1 years ago
D seems like the obvious choice here. We want to select the roles that can serve as proxies, not just a single user or multiple roles.
upvoted 0 times
Tijuana
1 years ago
B) To select proxies for multiple user roles that could serve as proxies for all
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
1 years ago
A) To select proxies for a single user that could serve as a proxy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
1 years ago
I see your point, having multiple user roles assigned to act as proxies can help streamline processes and improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
1 years ago
I believe it could also be to select proxies for multiple user roles that could serve as proxies for all, ensuring flexibility within the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
1 years ago
That makes sense, it's important to have someone who can act on behalf of another user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
1 years ago
I think you would associate proxy roles to a user role to select proxies for a single user that could serve as a proxy.
upvoted 0 times
Audra
1 years ago
D) To select the roles that could serve as proxies for that role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 years ago
C) To select a single user who can perform the role of a proxy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 years ago
B) To select proxies for multiple user roles that could serve as proxies for all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 years ago
A) To select proxies for a single user that could serve as a proxy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
1 years ago
Haha, tell me about it! I'm just hoping I don't accidentally select the wrong answer and end up with a proxy role I didn't want. That would be a real 'proxy mishap'!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 years ago
I agree, D makes the most sense to me. Though I have to admit, I'm a little nervous about this question. It seems like it could be a tricky one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm leaning more towards D. It seems like the most straightforward way to associate proxy roles to a user role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 years ago
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. But D also makes sense - you'd be selecting the roles that could serve as proxies for that specific role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 years ago
Well, based on the options, I think it's either B or D. Associating proxy roles to a user role would allow you to select multiple user roles that could serve as proxies, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 years ago
This is a tricky question! I'm not entirely sure about the correct answer. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel