Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_S4CPR_2502 Topic 6 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_S4CPR_2502 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 6
[All C_S4CPR_2502 Questions]

How is the KP! Contract leakage percentage defined?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Cora at Apr 30, 2025, 01:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_S4CPR_2502 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Johnna
1 months ago
I feel like D is the correct answer. Quantity of purchase orders without contract reference is the real definition of 'leakage' since it's spend happening outside the contract terms. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Stefany
21 days ago
I agree, A makes more sense when it comes to defining contract leakage percentage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
22 days ago
I think A is the correct answer. It's about spend without contract reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paulene
2 months ago
I think it's actually C) Confirmed quantity of purchase orders with contract reference. Quantity is also an important factor to consider in contract leakage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trip us up with all these options. I'm going with C - confirmed quantity of purchase orders with contract reference. Quantity is a clearer metric than spend, right?
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
26 days ago
I agree with you, C - confirmed quantity of purchase orders with contract reference seems like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be B - confirmed spend of purchase orders with contract reference. That makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
1 months ago
I think it's A - spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract. That seems like a common issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salome
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to track spend with and without contract references.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't B be a better measure of the actual confirmed spend under the contract? That seems like a more direct way to assess leakage.
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
29 days ago
True, both A and B have their merits in assessing contract leakage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
1 months ago
I see your point, but A focuses on identifying leakage from lack of contract reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 months ago
But B measures confirmed spend with contract reference, which seems more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
1 months ago
I think A is the correct answer. It measures spend without contract reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deandrea
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is defined by B) Confirmed spend of purchase orders with contract reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
2 months ago
I think the KP1 Contract leakage percentage is defined by A) Spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is A. Spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract. It makes the most sense to me as a measure of contract leakage.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Confirmed spend of purchase orders with contract reference could also be a valid measure of contract leakage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
1 months ago
I think it could also be D) Quantity of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract. That could also indicate leakage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
2 months ago
I agree, A) Spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract seems like the most accurate measure of contract leakage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel