Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_S43_2022 Topic 4 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_S43_2022 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 4
[All C_S43_2022 Questions]

What happens if you change the primary key of a functional location?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A counter is a device that measures the performance or usage of a technical object, such as a machine, a vehicle, or a pump. A counter replacement is a process that involves replacing a defective or outdated counter with a new one.A counter replacement can affect the maintenance planning and scheduling of the technical object, as some maintenance tasks may depend on the counter readings1.

To map a counter replacement in SAP S/4HANA Asset Management, you need to create a new measurement document and assign a valuation code for counter replacement. A measurement document is a record that contains the measurement readings of one or more counters or measuring points.A valuation code is a key that indicates the quality or validity of the measurement reading, such as OK, Not OK, Estimated, or Counter Replacement2.

By creating a new measurement document and assigning a valuation code for counter replacement, you can inform the system that the counter has been replaced and the previous counter readings are no longer valid. The system will then use the new counter readings for maintenance planning and scheduling purposes.You can also enter additional information about the counter replacement, such as the reason, the date, and the time3.

The other options are incorrect because:

Deactivate the current counter and create a new counter: This option is not recommended, as it will create a new counter object in the system and break the link with the previous counter object.This will result in data inconsistency and loss of historical information about the counter readings and maintenance activities3.

Create a new measurement document marked as a counter replacement: This option is incomplete, as it does not specify how to mark the measurement document as a counter replacement.You need to use the valuation code field to indicate the counter replacement3.

Assign a catalogue type for counter replacement to the measuring point category: This option is irrelevant, as it does not involve creating a new measurement document. A catalogue type is a key that defines the structure and content of a catalogue, which is a collection of codes and texts that describe the characteristics of a technical object, such as damage, cause, or activity. A measuring point category is a key that defines the attributes and functions of a measuring point, which is a physical or logical location where a measurement is taken.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lottie
2 months ago
I'm torn between A and D. On one hand, the labeling system needs to be updated. On the other, the user should have some control. Guess I'll just flip a coin!
upvoted 0 times
Mollie
8 days ago
A) The user must define a new labelling system for the new primary key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
21 days ago
D) The user must decide whether the functional location is assigned to a new superior functional location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 months ago
A) The user must define a new labelling system for the new primary key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
2 months ago
Ooh, Option D is the way to go! The user should get to decide how to handle the functional location after changing the primary key. Flexibility is key, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
2 months ago
Option C has got to be the right answer. Messing with the primary key would definitely make it impossible to change the superior functional location. Simple as that.
upvoted 0 times
Janae
26 days ago
C) Changing the superior functional location via alternative labeling is not possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
1 months ago
B) The functional location cannot be assigned to a new superior functional location when the new label is entered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
1 months ago
A) The user must define a new labelling system for the new primary key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emerson
2 months ago
I'm going with Option B. Changing the primary key should prevent you from reassigning the functional location to a new superior one. That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
Loise
1 months ago
I think Option D could also be a possibility, depending on the specific situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
2 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Taryn
2 months ago
Option A seems the most logical. Changing the primary key means you need to update the labeling system to match the new key. Duh!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
3 months ago
But wouldn't changing the primary key also affect the assignment to a new superior functional location?
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
3 months ago
I agree with Tayna. Changing the primary key would require a new labeling system to be defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
3 months ago
I think if you change the primary key of a functional location, you have to define a new labelling system.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel