Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_S43_2022 Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_S43_2022 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 2
[All C_S43_2022 Questions]

How does a performance-based maintenance plan calculate the interval between start date and planned date?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

A notification item is used to describe a problem, damage, or the activity executed in greater detail. A notification item can be assigned to one or more object parts and one or more causes of damage. An object part is a component of a technical object that is affected by a malfunction or damage. A cause of damage is a factor that leads to a malfunction or damage. You can use catalogs to enter object parts and causes of damage in a coded form. Therefore, the correct answers are B and D.


SAP Help Portal - Notification Item

SAP Help Portal - Object Part

SAP Help Portal - Cause of Damage

[SAP Learning - Creating Notifications]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cherri
1 months ago
Ah, the old 'divide by the scheduling period and cycle modification factor' trick. Classic maintenance exam question!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
2 months ago
I bet the answer is C. It just makes sense to me, you know? Like, why would they give us a choice that doesn't use the scheduling period and cycle modification factor?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
2 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going to go with D. Dividing the cycle length by the annual performance and then dividing by 365 to get the daily rate seems like the most accurate way to calculate the interval.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawna
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still think D is the best option. Dividing by annual performance and then by 365 gives a more precise interval calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe C is the right choice. Dividing the cycle length by the scheduling period and cycle modification factor seems more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
1 months ago
I think A is the correct answer. Dividing the cycle length by monthly performance and then multiplying by 12 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reita
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Dividing the cycle length by the annual performance seems more straightforward than the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
2 months ago
Hmm, I think C is the way to go. Dividing the cycle length by the scheduling period and cycle modification factor seems like the most logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
Bernadine
1 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a valid option. Dividing by annual performance over 365 days seems logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
2 months ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe C is the right choice. Dividing by the scheduling period and cycle modification factor makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
2 months ago
User 1: I think A is the correct calculation. Monthly performance multiplied by 12 should give the annual performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonor
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
2 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel