SAP Exam C_PO_7521 Topic 6 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_PO_7521 exam

Question #: 40
Topic #: 6

[All C_PO_7521 Questions]

What is the appearance of an implicit mapping in the SAP NWDS (Eclipse) Mapping Editor within a BPM process?

AA solid line

BA double solid line

CA dotted line

DA dashed line

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Jutta at Mar 21, 2024, 12:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_PO_7521 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Catarina

1 years ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the answer, no question about it. Unless you want your messages to be 'exactly once in disorder'!

upvoted 0 times

Paulene

1 years ago

Definitely, it's important to maintain message sequence in asynchronous scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krissy

1 years ago

I agree, using EOIO ensures that messages are processed in the order they were sent.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

1 years ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the answer, no question about it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chan

1 years ago

I feel like Best Effort (BE) could also work, but it might not guarantee the message sequence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Graham

1 years ago

I agree with Moira, using EOIO will ensure the message sequence remains identical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tatum

1 years ago

qRFC? More like 'Que? RFC?' I'm sticking with Exactly Once in Order for this one, folks.

upvoted 0 times

Albert

1 years ago

Yeah, that sounds like the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

1 years ago

I think I'll go with Exactly Once in Order too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Una

1 years ago

Yeah, qRFC sounds confusing. I'll go with Exactly Once in Order too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammi

1 years ago

I agree, Exactly Once in Order is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

1 years ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the way to keep those messages in line, just like my socks after laundry day.

upvoted 0 times

Tamesha

1 years ago

I agree, EOIO ensures that messages are processed in the correct order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micheline

1 years ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the way to keep those messages in line, just like my socks after laundry day.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

1 years ago

Best Effort (BE)? More like 'Best of Luck' if you ask me. I'm going with Exactly Once in Order all the way!

upvoted 0 times

Jerry

1 years ago

Best Effort? Good luck with that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

1 years ago

Exactly Once in Order

upvoted 0 times

...

Moira

1 years ago

I think we should use Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

1 years ago

C'mon, Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the only way to go! We don't want any message sequence shenanigans, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Kimbery

1 years ago

Let's stick with Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this asynchronous scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

1 years ago

qRFC is not the best option for maintaining message sequence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrinne

1 years ago

Exactly Once (EO) might work, but EOIO is the safer choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

1 years ago

Best Effort (BE) just won't cut it for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

1 years ago

Agreed, we need to make sure the message sequence is maintained.

upvoted 0 times

...

Millie

1 years ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is definitely the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

1 years ago

I feel like Best Effort (BE) could also work, but it might not guarantee the message sequence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

1 years ago

I agree with using EOIO will ensure the message sequence remains identical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paul

1 years ago

I think we should use Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...