SAP C_MDG_1909 Exam - Topic 7 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_MDG_1909 exam

Question #: 86
Topic #: 7

[All C_MDG_1909 Questions]

You are customizing the material data model governance scopeunder process modeling and have set the governed flag to "No" for some attributes within an entity. What happens to these attributes? Note: There are 3 correct answers to this question.

AThey are displayed as read-only within the UI.

BThey can be changed in a material consolidation process.

CThey cannot be changed in mass processing of material.

DThey are temporarily removed from the material data model.

EThey can still be loaded to active area without central governance.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Linn at May 11, 2024, 05:02 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_MDG_1909 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Hoa

3 months ago

Not sure about that, sounds too good to be true!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elza

3 months ago

They are displayed as read-only in the UI, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Latosha

3 months ago

Wait, so they can be changed in a consolidation process? Really?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

4 months ago

Agree, that's a key point!

upvoted 0 times

...

Joni

4 months ago

They can still be loaded to active area without central governance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

4 months ago

I wonder if they are temporarily removed from the data model? That seems like a possibility, but I can't recall clearly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniela

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like they can still be loaded to the active area without central governance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about attributes being read-only in the UI when governed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusa

5 months ago

I think if the governed flag is set to "No," those attributes might be editable in certain processes, like material consolidation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question, but I want to make sure I'm not missing any nuances. I'll carefully consider each option and try to visualize how the attributes would behave in the system when the governed flag is set to "No".

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The wording is a bit technical, and I'm not entirely sure what the "material data model governance scope" is referring to. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

5 months ago

Okay, let me see here. If the governed flag is set to "No", that means the attributes are not under central governance, right? So I'm guessing that could affect how they can be changed or processed. I'll need to analyze each option closely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johna

5 months ago

Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the implications of the "governed flag" being set to "No" for certain attributes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeff

5 months ago

Alright, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is understanding the impact of the "governed flag" being set to "No". That's going to be the key to determining which of these options are correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wava

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deandrea

5 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to review my notes on cost accounting to make sure I'm applying the right definitions here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

9 months ago

Oh, the joys of material data model governance! I can practically feel the excitement through the screen. But hey, at least they didn't ask us to bake a cake while solving this problem, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

9 months ago

Alright, let's see... B, C, and E seem to be the way to go. Although, I have to admit, the 'temporarily removed' option is kind of intriguing. Wonder if that's a secret hidden feature?

upvoted 0 times

Malcolm

8 months ago

I'm curious about D as well, maybe it's a temporary removal for a specific purpose.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sina

8 months ago

E sounds correct too, as they can still be loaded without central governance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leandro

8 months ago

C is also right because mass processing of material won't be able to change those attributes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

8 months ago

I think B is correct because material consolidation processes can change those attributes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

10 months ago

Haha, I bet the exam writer was feeling a bit 'material' when they came up with this one. But seriously, I'm going with B, C, and E. Trying to change the governed attributes in mass processing sounds like a recipe for disaster!

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearlie

10 months ago

Wait, are you sure D is not one of the correct answers? I thought 'temporarily removed from the material data model' was an option. Guess I'll have to re-read the question carefully.

upvoted 0 times

Ronny

8 months ago

C) They cannot be changed in mass processing of material.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annalee

8 months ago

B) They can be changed in a material consolidation process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

8 months ago

A) They are displayed as read-only within the UI.

upvoted 0 times

...

Broderick

10 months ago

Hmm, I think the correct answers are B, C, and E. If the governed flag is set to 'No', the attributes should be editable in consolidation, not changeable in mass processing, and can still be loaded without central governance.

upvoted 0 times