SAP C_MDG_1909 Exam - Topic 4 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_MDG_1909 exam

Question #: 81
Topic #: 4

[All C_MDG_1909 Questions]

You are adding a custom entity as a list user interface buildingblock (UIBB) to the corresponding user interface. The UIBB should be visible based on the type of change request. What is the correct way to do this? Choose the correct answer.

ACustomize the UI configuration to add a new list UIBB for the custom entity. Use the feeder class to hide the UIBB.

BCustomize the UI configuration to add a new list UIBB for the custom entity. Use context based adaptation to configure the Ulbased on the change request type.

CCreate a new change request type. Adjust the UI configuration to add a new list UIBB for the custom entity. Use context based adaptation to configure the UI based on the step number.

DCreate a new change request type. Adjust the UI configuration to add a new list UIBB for the custom entity. Use the feeder class to hide the UIBB.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Ozell at Mar 05, 2024, 09:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_MDG_1909 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Merri

3 months ago

D is just hiding the UIBB, not really solving the visibility issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dahlia

3 months ago

C could work too, but B is definitely more straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evelynn

3 months ago

Wait, can we really use context-based adaptation for this? Sounds tricky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

4 months ago

Agreed, B seems like the best option here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mohammad

4 months ago

I think B is the right choice. Context-based adaptation makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

4 months ago

I lean towards option A, but I’m uncertain if hiding the UIBB with the feeder class is the best approach for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolland

4 months ago

I feel like we had a similar question where we had to decide between using a feeder class or context-based adaptation, but I can't recall the details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

4 months ago

I think option B sounds familiar because it aligns with what we practiced about configuring UIBBs based on different criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billy

5 months ago

I remember we discussed using context-based adaptation in class, but I'm not sure if it's specifically for the change request type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remona

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards option D. Creating a new change request type and then using the feeder class to hide the UIBB seems like a simpler approach than messing with context-based adaptation. But I'm not 100% sure that's the right way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawanda

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The correct answer is B - customize the UI configuration to add the new UIBB, then use context-based adaptation to show/hide it based on the change request type. That way we don't have to create a new change request type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colton

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to add the custom entity UIBB, but I'm not sure if we should be creating a new change request type or just using the existing ones. The wording is a bit confusing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

5 months ago

This looks like a straightforward UI configuration question. I think the key is understanding how to use context-based adaptation to show/hide the UIBB based on the change request type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. I just need to use the Stream.of() method to create a stream of the two lists, then flatMap() to flatten them into a single stream, and finally forEach() to print the elements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know SOAP is used for web services, but I'm not sure which specific service type is used for access tokens. I'll have to review my notes on SOAP and OAuth2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecilia

5 months ago

Wait, isn't an IFB used for competitive bidding? I'm not sure that's the right fit for Ned's situation. I better double-check the definitions of these procurement documents.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chau

5 months ago

I remember continuous delivery focuses on getting updates out quickly, but I'm not totally sure if that's the main goal here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

11 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think option C could also be a valid solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julio

11 months ago

I agree with Lera, option B seems to be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniel

11 months ago

Hmm, I think option B is the correct answer here. Using context-based adaptation to configure the UI based on the change request type seems like the most straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times