New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP C_MDG_1909 Exam - Topic 2 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_MDG_1909 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 2
[All C_MDG_1909 Questions]

You want to derive fields like transportation zone and country based on the business partner group. What options are available to achieve this? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Celeste
3 months ago
I disagree, C is definitely not a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
3 months ago
Wait, can you really use BRFplus for this? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
3 months ago
Definitely A and D! Makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
4 months ago
I think B could work too, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
4 months ago
A and C are the right options!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
I’m uncertain about the custom feeder class in option B; I don’t think we covered that in detail during our sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
4 months ago
I feel like BRFplus could be a good choice too, but I can't recall if it specifically relates to the Business Partner Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
4 months ago
I remember practicing with the CROSS_ENTITY_BADI in a similar question, so I might lean towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
5 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure how the access class works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
5 months ago
I've got this one! The access class and the custom feeder class are the two correct answers here. I'm confident in those approaches, and I'll make sure to explain them clearly in my response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about deriving fields based on the business partner group. I'm thinking the access class and the BRFplus options might be the way to go, but I'm not 100% sure. I'll need to review the details on those approaches before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
5 months ago
Hmm, this one seems a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure about the options available, but I think the access class and custom feeder class might be the way to go. I'll need to double-check the details on those approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
5 months ago
I think I know how to approach this. The question is asking about deriving fields like transportation zone and country based on the business partner group, and it says there are two correct answers. I'm pretty sure the access class and custom feeder class are the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
5 months ago
I think the Lightning Record Page is the best option here. It allows you to display all the customer information on a single screen, which is exactly what the requirement is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
10 months ago
Wait, you mean I can't just use a magic wand and make those fields appear? Bummer. Guess I'll have to settle for the 'boring' but effective options B and D. At least it's not as complex as a 'CROSS_ENTITY_BADI'... whatever that is!
upvoted 0 times
Katina
8 months ago
Yeah, it might not be as magical as a wand, but options B and D will get the job done!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
9 months ago
B) Use Business Rule Framework Plus (BRFplus) to derive the fields using a decision table based on the Business Partner Group field in the user interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
9 months ago
CROSS_ENTITY_BADI does sound complicated, but at least we have simpler options like B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
9 months ago
A) Use a custom feeder class to derive the fields based on Business Partner group field in the user interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
9 months ago
I know, it would be nice if we could just magically make the fields appear, but options B and D are the best bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
9 months ago
Yeah, using a custom feeder class or BRFplus is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sean
10 months ago
I'm gonna go with B and D. Custom feeder class and BRFplus - the dynamic duo to rule them all! Although, I hear option C involves a lot of 'cross-entity' action. Sounds a bit spicy, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Glenna
8 months ago
Fair point. Let's go with B and D then. Custom feeder class and BRFplus it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
8 months ago
True, but I prefer sticking with the dynamic duo of B and D. Custom feeder class and BRFplus for the win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
9 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Option C with CROSS_ENTITY_BADI does sound intriguing though. It might add some spice to the mix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
10 months ago
I think B and D are the way to go. Custom feeder class and BRFplus seem like a powerful combo.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
10 months ago
Hmm, access class, really? That's so last decade. I'm all about those shiny new features like BRFplus. Option D is where it's at, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
10 months ago
Ah, the classic Business Partner Group conundrum. I'm feeling option C - CROSS_ENTITY_BADI all the way. Gotta love those fancy BADI's!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
10 months ago
Option B and D seem like the way to go. Custom feeder class and BRFplus decision table - that's the power combo to get those derived fields!
upvoted 0 times
Rebbeca
10 months ago
Definitely, those options provide a lot of flexibility and control in determining the fields based on the Business Partner Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
10 months ago
I agree, using a custom feeder class and BRFplus decision table is a powerful combination for deriving fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felton
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also be a valid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
11 months ago
I agree with Lashanda, using access class and BRFplus seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
11 months ago
I think option A and D are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel