Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_MDG_1909 Topic 2 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_MDG_1909 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 2
[All C_MDG_1909 Questions]

You want to derive fields like transportation zone and country based on the business partner group. What options are available to achieve this? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D, E

by Eden at Sep 18, 2024, 09:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_MDG_1909 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Callie
3 months ago
Wait, you mean I can't just use a magic wand and make those fields appear? Bummer. Guess I'll have to settle for the 'boring' but effective options B and D. At least it's not as complex as a 'CROSS_ENTITY_BADI'... whatever that is!
upvoted 0 times
Katina
2 months ago
Yeah, it might not be as magical as a wand, but options B and D will get the job done!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
2 months ago
B) Use Business Rule Framework Plus (BRFplus) to derive the fields using a decision table based on the Business Partner Group field in the user interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
2 months ago
CROSS_ENTITY_BADI does sound complicated, but at least we have simpler options like B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
2 months ago
A) Use a custom feeder class to derive the fields based on Business Partner group field in the user interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
3 months ago
I know, it would be nice if we could just magically make the fields appear, but options B and D are the best bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
3 months ago
Yeah, using a custom feeder class or BRFplus is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sean
4 months ago
I'm gonna go with B and D. Custom feeder class and BRFplus - the dynamic duo to rule them all! Although, I hear option C involves a lot of 'cross-entity' action. Sounds a bit spicy, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Glenna
2 months ago
Fair point. Let's go with B and D then. Custom feeder class and BRFplus it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
2 months ago
True, but I prefer sticking with the dynamic duo of B and D. Custom feeder class and BRFplus for the win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Option C with CROSS_ENTITY_BADI does sound intriguing though. It might add some spice to the mix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
3 months ago
I think B and D are the way to go. Custom feeder class and BRFplus seem like a powerful combo.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
4 months ago
Hmm, access class, really? That's so last decade. I'm all about those shiny new features like BRFplus. Option D is where it's at, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
4 months ago
Ah, the classic Business Partner Group conundrum. I'm feeling option C - CROSS_ENTITY_BADI all the way. Gotta love those fancy BADI's!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
4 months ago
Option B and D seem like the way to go. Custom feeder class and BRFplus decision table - that's the power combo to get those derived fields!
upvoted 0 times
Rebbeca
3 months ago
Definitely, those options provide a lot of flexibility and control in determining the fields based on the Business Partner Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
3 months ago
I agree, using a custom feeder class and BRFplus decision table is a powerful combination for deriving fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felton
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also be a valid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
4 months ago
I agree with Lashanda, using access class and BRFplus seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
4 months ago
I think option A and D are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel