I think the correct answer is B. Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked. This makes sense to me as a way to minimize the impact of the change.
I'm not sure about that. I think the whole hierarchy of the node being changed should be locked to ensure consistency in the changes made. So, I would go with option D.
I agree with Catherin. It makes sense that only the elements directly related to the node being changed are locked, allowing for more flexibility in making adjustments.
Shizue
7 days agoGearldine
25 days agoKattie
28 days agoCatherin
30 days ago