I'm going to go with A. Only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked. Seems like the most efficient approach to me.
Hmm, I was leaning towards D. The whole hierarchy of the node being changed is locked. That seems like the safest option to me, even if it's a bit overkill.
I think the correct answer is B. Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked. This makes sense to me as a way to minimize the impact of the change.
I'm not sure about that. I think the whole hierarchy of the node being changed should be locked to ensure consistency in the changes made. So, I would go with option D.
I agree with Catherin. It makes sense that only the elements directly related to the node being changed are locked, allowing for more flexibility in making adjustments.
Felton
3 months agoKenneth
3 months agoMabel
1 months agoShannon
2 months agoRosendo
2 months agoFrederick
2 months agoTomas
3 months agoColette
2 months agoLashandra
2 months agoRana
3 months agoTracey
4 months agoPedro
2 months agoMillie
2 months agoAnnmarie
3 months agoShizue
4 months agoLashawn
2 months agoPaulene
2 months agoAntonio
2 months agoSheron
2 months agoCortney
2 months agoRory
3 months agoMerilyn
3 months agoKenneth
3 months agoDaren
3 months agoShaun
3 months agoSilva
3 months agoGearldine
4 months agoKattie
5 months agoCatherin
5 months ago