SAP Exam C_MDG_1909 Topic 10 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_MDG_1909 exam

Question #: 71
Topic #: 10

[All C_MDG_1909 Questions]

What is the benefit of loose interlocking for hierarchies withinthe same change request? Choose the correct answer.

AOnly the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node beingchanged are locked.

BOnly nodes directly below the parent node of the node beingchanged are locked.

CThe next child element of the node being changed is locked.

DThe whole hierarchy of the node being changed is locked.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, D, E

by Carin at Jul 28, 2023, 07:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_MDG_1909 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Felton

30 days ago

Honestly, I'm just here for the free donuts they promised at the end of the exam. Who cares about change requests?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

1 months ago

I don't know, this question is making my head spin. Can we just skip it and move on to the next one? I need a coffee break.

upvoted 0 times

Rosendo

5 days ago

I think the answer is A) Only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederick

10 days ago

Sure, let's skip it and move on. Coffee break sounds good.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomas

1 months ago

I'm going to go with A. Only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked. Seems like the most efficient approach to me.

upvoted 0 times

Colette

2 days ago

A makes sense, it's the most efficient option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashandra

9 days ago

I think A is the correct answer too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rana

20 days ago

I agree, A seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracey

2 months ago

Hmm, I was leaning towards D. The whole hierarchy of the node being changed is locked. That seems like the safest option to me, even if it's a bit overkill.

upvoted 0 times

Pedro

10 days ago

C) The next child element of the node being changed is locked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Millie

13 days ago

B) Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

26 days ago

A) Only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shizue

2 months ago

I think the correct answer is B. Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked. This makes sense to me as a way to minimize the impact of the change.

upvoted 0 times

Paulene

4 days ago

I agree, it's a good way to ensure that only relevant nodes are affected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

5 days ago

That's correct! It helps in minimizing the impact of the change.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

9 days ago

I think the correct answer is B. Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cortney

15 days ago

D) The whole hierarchy of the node being changed is locked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

17 days ago

Yes, locking only the nodes directly below the parent node helps maintain flexibility in the hierarchy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

18 days ago

I think it's important to only lock the nodes directly below the parent node to avoid unnecessary restrictions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

18 days ago

C) The next child element of the node being changed is locked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

19 days ago

I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaun

1 months ago

B) Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Silva

1 months ago

A) Only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

2 months ago

I'm not sure about that. I think the whole hierarchy of the node being changed should be locked to ensure consistency in the changes made. So, I would go with option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

3 months ago

I agree with Catherin. It makes sense that only the elements directly related to the node being changed are locked, allowing for more flexibility in making adjustments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catherin

3 months ago

I think the benefit of loose interlocking is that only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked.

upvoted 0 times

...