Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_MDG_1909 Topic 10 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_MDG_1909 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 10
[All C_MDG_1909 Questions]

What is the benefit of loose interlocking for hierarchies withinthe same change request? Choose the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D, E

by Carin at Jul 28, 2023, 08:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_MDG_1909 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Larue
2 days ago
I think loose interlocking means that not everything gets locked, but I'm not sure which option that relates to.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
13 days ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The options don't seem to directly match the description in the prompt. I'll have to re-read it a few times and try to figure out the best answer, but I'm not feeling super confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
16 days ago
A grid chart with pie charts could work, but I'm worried it might be too busy and hard to read. I'll need to consider the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
5 months ago
Honestly, I'm just here for the free donuts they promised at the end of the exam. Who cares about change requests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
5 months ago
I don't know, this question is making my head spin. Can we just skip it and move on to the next one? I need a coffee break.
upvoted 0 times
Mabel
3 months ago
Great, let's move on to the next question after our coffee break.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
3 months ago
I agree, let's go with that answer and take a break.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
4 months ago
I think the answer is A) Only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
4 months ago
Sure, let's skip it and move on. Coffee break sounds good.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tomas
5 months ago
I'm going to go with A. Only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked. Seems like the most efficient approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
Colette
4 months ago
A makes sense, it's the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
4 months ago
I think A is the correct answer too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
4 months ago
I agree, A seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tracey
5 months ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards D. The whole hierarchy of the node being changed is locked. That seems like the safest option to me, even if it's a bit overkill.
upvoted 0 times
Pedro
4 months ago
C) The next child element of the node being changed is locked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
4 months ago
B) Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
4 months ago
A) Only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shizue
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked. This makes sense to me as a way to minimize the impact of the change.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawn
4 months ago
Definitely, it's a useful feature for managing hierarchies within change requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
4 months ago
I agree, it's a good way to ensure that only relevant nodes are affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
That's correct! It helps in minimizing the impact of the change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
4 months ago
D) The whole hierarchy of the node being changed is locked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
4 months ago
Yes, locking only the nodes directly below the parent node helps maintain flexibility in the hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I think it's important to only lock the nodes directly below the parent node to avoid unnecessary restrictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
C) The next child element of the node being changed is locked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
4 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
5 months ago
B) Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
5 months ago
A) Only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
6 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think the whole hierarchy of the node being changed should be locked to ensure consistency in the changes made. So, I would go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
6 months ago
I agree with Catherin. It makes sense that only the elements directly related to the node being changed are locked, allowing for more flexibility in making adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
6 months ago
I think the benefit of loose interlocking is that only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel