SAP C_IBP_2502 Exam - Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_IBP_2502 exam

Question #: 10
Topic #: 1

You need to define a new logic for a key figure to drive values from the PERPRODCUSTREGION level to the PERPRODCUST level. Which of the following configuration options are possible for this process? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question

ASplitting the values from detailed to aggregated level by using a copy operator

BSplitting the values from aggregated to detailed level using multiplication by the proportions

CSplitting the values form aggregated to detailed level, based on the time profile attribute

DSplitting the values from aggregated to detailed level, based on a stored split-factor key figure

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D

by Bernadine at Jul 11, 2025, 01:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_IBP_2502 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Man

1 month ago

C seems a bit tricky, not sure about that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyra

2 months ago

Wait, can you really use multiplication for this? Sounds off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

2 months ago

I think D makes sense too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shakira

2 months ago

A is definitely a valid option!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mindy

2 months ago

I have a vague memory of time profile attributes being mentioned, so maybe option C is a possibility, but I’m not confident about it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

2 months ago

I think option B sounds familiar, but I can't recall if we specifically covered splitting from aggregated to detailed levels using multiplication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arleen

3 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option D might be valid since we talked about using split-factor key figures in a similar practice question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Floyd

3 months ago

I remember we discussed using a copy operator for splitting values from detailed to aggregated levels, so I think option A could be correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

In

3 months ago

B is not the way to go, just saying!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nilsa

3 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the difference between the "splitting" options. I think I'll make my best guess and then double-check my work before submitting the exam.

upvoted 0 times

...

Silvana

3 months ago

Alright, let me break this down step-by-step. We need to go from the PERPRODCUSTREGION level to the PERPRODCUST level, so that rules out option A. Options B and D both mention splitting from aggregated to detailed, which sounds more like what we need. I think I'll go with those two.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Can we really split values from a detailed level to an aggregated level? That doesn't seem right to me. I'll need to re-read the options more carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

4 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on the level of detail - we need to split the values from the aggregated PERPRODCUSTREGION level down to the more detailed PERPRODCUST level. I'm pretty confident that options A and B are the correct answers here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

4 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully to make sure I get the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anissa

4 months ago

I'm pretty confident I know the right answer here. The key is to use the multiplication by proportions and the stored split-factor key figure options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracey

4 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on the differences between splitting from detailed to aggregated level versus aggregated to detailed level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to re-read the question a few times to make sure I understand what's being asked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

5 months ago

This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to think through the different configuration options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Troy

7 months ago

I believe option B could also work, splitting values using multiplication by proportions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

7 months ago

Haha, splitting values from detailed to aggregated level? That's like trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube! B and D are definitely the way to go.

upvoted 0 times